Comorbid Chronic Illness and the Diagnosis and Treatment of Depression in Safety Net Primary Care Settings

Abstract

Objective To estimate the impact of chronic medical conditions on depression diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up care in primary care settings. Design This was a cross-sectional study that used interviewer-administered surveys and medical record reviews. Three hundred fifteen participants were recruited from 3 public primary care clinics. Depression diagnosis, guideline-concordant treatment, and follow-up care were the primary outcomes examined in individuals with depression alone compared with individuals with depression and chronic medical conditions measured using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Results Physician diagnosis of depression (32.6%), guideline-concordant depression treatment (32.7%), and guideline-concordant follow-up care (16.3%) were all low. Logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference in the likelihood of depression diagnosis, guideline-concordant treatment, or follow-up care in individuals with depression alone compared with those with both depression and chronic medical conditions. Participants with severe depression were, however, twice as likely to receive a diagnosis of depression as participants with moderate depression. In addition, participants with moderately severe and severe depression received much less appropriate follow-up care than participants with moderate depression. Among participants receiving a depression diagnosis, 74% received guideline-concordant treatment. Conclusion Physician depression care in primary care settings is not influenced by competing demands for care for other comorbid medical conditions.

Depression, quality of life and primary care: A cross-sectional study

“…This percentage may seem too large; however, in studies from primary care settings the results are similar. Ani et al [42] in a sample of 315 patients found 32.5% of the population presented with depressive symptomatology, and other studies from the United States have reported similar results [43,44]. Such results show that depression is heavily under-diagnosed in primary care worldwide, and there is also a female predominance in undiagnosed depression.…”

Time to Depression Treatment in Primary Care Among HIV-infected and Uninfected Veterans

“…We hypothesized that time to depression treatment would be shorter among HIV-infected patients because ID providers have smaller patient panels, can schedule earlier return appointments, and have longer appointment times compared to GM providers. Also, we hypothesized that the time to depression treatment would be shortest among patients with severe depressive symptoms 16 .…”

Patient-Centered Care in Affective, Non-Affective, and Schizoaffective Groups: Patients’ Opinions and Attitudes

“…There is some evidence that co-morbid conditions (multiple competing demands) affect the quality of care in primary health care settings (Ani et al 2009). Additionally, some studies are starting to examine the effects of comorbid conditions on the quality of mental health care .…”