2013
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2013.2253539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compact 2 $\times$ 2 Coupled Double Loop GPS Antenna Array Loaded With Broadside Coupled Split Ring Resonators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the maximum total efficiency is achieved at f c with a value of −0.5 dB, and also keeps above −1 dB within a range of 20 MHz, being the array more than adequate for the GPS signal bandwidth requirements. It is important to remark that the total efficiency achieved by this AA example is higher than many recently proposed compact designs . The main reason is that these array designs are intended to reduce reflected power at the expense of creating a lossy structure by, for example, employing high dielectric permittivity, fences, resonant structures, or decoupling and matching networks, which actually creates an inefficient array system.…”
Section: Efficient Compact Microstrip Aamentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the maximum total efficiency is achieved at f c with a value of −0.5 dB, and also keeps above −1 dB within a range of 20 MHz, being the array more than adequate for the GPS signal bandwidth requirements. It is important to remark that the total efficiency achieved by this AA example is higher than many recently proposed compact designs . The main reason is that these array designs are intended to reduce reflected power at the expense of creating a lossy structure by, for example, employing high dielectric permittivity, fences, resonant structures, or decoupling and matching networks, which actually creates an inefficient array system.…”
Section: Efficient Compact Microstrip Aamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is important to remark that the total efficiency achieved by this AA example is higher than many recently proposed compact designs. 4,5,17,18,23,24 The main reason is that these array designs are intended to reduce reflected power at the expense of creating a lossy structure by, for example, employing high dielectric permittivity, fences, resonant structures, or decoupling and matching networks, which actually creates an inefficient array system. However, as we have previously described, it is not necessary to make use of these elements if our approach is adopted.…”
Section: Array Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the decoupling methods mentioned earlier are restricted to linearly polarized antenna arrays. In a more recent work, the broadside coupled SRRs (BC‐SRR) have been located and oriented strategically in order to reduce mutual coupling between circularly polarized (CP) elements within a compact global positioning system (GPS) patch antenna array . This technique offers a coupling suppression of 10 dB; however, its obvious drawbacks involve a larger number of expensive SRRs, relatively higher profile, and challenging assembly process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various efforts to solve this problem are found in literature, e.g. by means of adding a decoupling and matching network [10], [11] able to decouple the coupled patterns of the antennas, or by using, for instance, split ring resonators (SRRs) to stop the coupling between the elements [12]. These techniques are, however, manufacturingintensive and considerably increase the cost of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%