2016 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iccsp.2016.7754240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compact circular patch antenna for SWB applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monopole antenna structures with circular, elliptical, or hybrid patch along modified feeding structure has been reported to achieve broadband operation with high impedance matching 2–6 . Coplanar waveguide (CPW) feeding technique or microstrip line feeding technique along with modified radiating patch and ground plane has been applied to enhance bandwidth successfully 7–10 . Fractal antenna structures like Sierpinski structure, Koch structure, and Apollonius structures combined with modified ground are used to reduce the dimension of the antenna 11–17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Monopole antenna structures with circular, elliptical, or hybrid patch along modified feeding structure has been reported to achieve broadband operation with high impedance matching 2–6 . Coplanar waveguide (CPW) feeding technique or microstrip line feeding technique along with modified radiating patch and ground plane has been applied to enhance bandwidth successfully 7–10 . Fractal antenna structures like Sierpinski structure, Koch structure, and Apollonius structures combined with modified ground are used to reduce the dimension of the antenna 11–17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6] Coplanar waveguide (CPW) feeding technique or microstrip line feeding technique along with modified radiating patch and ground plane has been applied to enhance bandwidth successfully. [7][8][9][10] Fractal antenna structures like Sierpinski structure, Koch structure, and Apollonius structures combined with modified ground are used to reduce the dimension of the antenna. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Although fractal antenna is used for miniaturization, better impedance matching, and consistent performance, designing and manufacturing of this type of antenna is very much complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To embed the benefits of SWB technology in practical wireless applications, multidimensional research has been undertaken for diverse antenna configurations. For the purpose of achieving wider bandwidth, many different kinds of bandwidth enhancement techniques, such as modification in the ground plane and the patch [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ] along with a diverse range of feeding techniques, such as microstrip tapered feedline [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ] and Coplanar Waveguide (CPW) feed [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ], have been proposed by antenna designers. To miniaturize the dimension of antenna without impacting the impedance bandwidth, self-similarity structures, such as fractal geometry [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ], have been envisioned in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A CPW-fed propeller-structured monopole antenna for SWB application is demonstrated to provide a good impedance bandwidth from 3 to 35 GHz; however, it suffers from a lower BDR value (809) due to its large electrical dimensions [ 14 ]. In [ 15 ], a CPW-fed antenna with inverted triangular shaped patch is designed to exploit across the frequency range from 3.06 to 35 GHz. However, the gain of the proposed antenna structures has not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%