2018
DOI: 10.3390/en11092231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compact Water-Cooled Thermoelectric Generator (TEG) Based on a Portable Gas Stove

Abstract: A compact water-cooled thermoelectric generator (TEG) based on a portable gas stove was designed and analyzed to supply electricity in off-grid scenarios. The TEG incorporates a newly designed heat collector, eight thermoelectric (TE) modules, and a radiator to ensure its portability (5.9 kg) and sufficiency of electric power (12.9 W). Detailed measurements and discussions on power load feature and TE efficiency are presented. Experiments showed that the power generation capability of the proposed TEG is compr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lv et al [31] used a similar analytical model to predict the output power of a TEG, obtaining a value 18.6% higher than the real value, while in the present work this value was 175.4% higher than the actual output power. However, the temperature difference was 44.1% lower than the used in this work, which is relevant since the higher the temperature gradient used, the greater are the errors added to the calculations, as evidenced by Orr et al, who presented a simplified analytical method to describe TEGs, in which output power and efficiency curves started to deviate at higher temperature gradients [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Lv et al [31] used a similar analytical model to predict the output power of a TEG, obtaining a value 18.6% higher than the real value, while in the present work this value was 175.4% higher than the actual output power. However, the temperature difference was 44.1% lower than the used in this work, which is relevant since the higher the temperature gradient used, the greater are the errors added to the calculations, as evidenced by Orr et al, who presented a simplified analytical method to describe TEGs, in which output power and efficiency curves started to deviate at higher temperature gradients [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Water cooling is by far the most widely adapted cooling method in most thermal systems, and TEG is no exception [64]. The high heat capacity of water and its abundant availability make it more attractive Although a substantial amount of power will be used to move the water, this parasitic loss will be accounted for when defining the total efficiency of the device.…”
Section: Water Coolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum efficiency of 4.44% at the power output of 146.5 W was achieved with a coolant at 30 • C. In the case of STEG, forced water cooling was researched extensively. A microchannel heat sink was designed to cool the individual thermopiles and was able to generate 4.9 W at electrical efficiency of 2.9% when the temperature difference was 109 • C [64]. Yazawa [70] was able to achieve 1% convection efficiency by using ambient water and a Fresnel lens.…”
Section: Forced Convectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrical generation by thermoelectricity has many fields of application [20]. TEGs were used as reliable sources of electrical energy in extreme environments [21] and in remote areas for off-grid micro generation [22]. Very recently, novel designs increased the energy efficiency of solar TEGs that include solar concentrators with flat-plate micro-channel heat pipes [23].…”
Section: Thermoelectric Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%