Compact Y-shape antenna for dual polarized wideband response

Wideband Dual Polarized Compact Design of Pi-Shape Microstrip Antenna for Gsm, Ism, and Satellite Applications

“…As per the parametric study carried out concerning the stub length variations, it is clear that 'stub 1' affects both TM 20 and TM 30 mode frequencies while 'stub 2' mainly affects the TM 30 mode frequency. Hence, further formulations at these resonant modes are obtained by adding the total stub length ('L sv1 +L sh1 ' and 'L sv2 +L sh2 ') effect on the respective mode resonant lengths as given in Equations ( 10)- (11). The frequency calculated for this increment in the total stub length using Equation ( 8) agrees closely with the simulated result, as shown in Figs.…”

“…Microstrip antenna (MSA) is one of the best candidates for these requirements because of its low-profile nature and ease of integration with microwave integrated circuits [1][2][3][4]. Several techniques like the use of stack resonators [5,6], slot or stub loaded MSAs [7][8][9][10][11], and different probe feeding techniques [12] have been reported for the realization of wider BW, offering polarization agility. The use of parasitic metallic cone and two microstrip feed lines [13], or the combination of multiple patch parameters along with a modified feeding technique [14][15][16][17], leads to a complex design for realizing the dual-polarized (DP) wideband response.…”

Design of a wideband Y‐shaped antenna for the application in IoT and 5G communication

“…1 has larger physical size, narrow bandwidth, and low gain in comparsion with our proposed design. The compact Y-shaped antenna of Deshmukh et al 16 has a huge physical size of (38 Â 100) mm 2 , excited with a proximity feeding method, which is not suitable for high-frequency applications and also the operational bandwidth is narrow in contrast with our proposed antenna. The slot antenna of Shukla et al 17 with a Y-shaped impedance matching section has a very large physical size and bidirectional radiation pattern, which are the major differences with our proposed design.…”