2017
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CompAnnotate: a comparative approach to annotate base-pairing interactions in RNA 3D structures

Abstract: The analysis of RNA tertiary structure is hindered by the fact that not too many structural data are available and a significant amount of them are in low resolution. Due to the atomic coordinate errors posed by the limitations of low-resolution RNA three-dimensional structures, it becomes a critical challenge to extract key geometric characteristics of RNA, particularly, the interaction of bases. To address this issue, we have devised a comparative method, named CompAnnotate, that utilizes more precise struct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Users can provide atomic coordinates in PDB or PDBx/mmCIF format files, or the PDB IDs along with chain IDs and LocalSTAR3D will search and download them from the PDB website automatically. There are several RNA base pair annotation tools, including MC-Annotate ( 23 , 24 ), RNAView ( 25 ), FR3D ( 16 ), DSSR ( 26 ), ClaRNA ( 27 ) and CompAnnotate ( 28 ). LocalSTAR3D uses DSSR to identify the base-pairing interactions as it supports both PDB and PDBx/mmCIF formats.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Users can provide atomic coordinates in PDB or PDBx/mmCIF format files, or the PDB IDs along with chain IDs and LocalSTAR3D will search and download them from the PDB website automatically. There are several RNA base pair annotation tools, including MC-Annotate ( 23 , 24 ), RNAView ( 25 ), FR3D ( 16 ), DSSR ( 26 ), ClaRNA ( 27 ) and CompAnnotate ( 28 ). LocalSTAR3D uses DSSR to identify the base-pairing interactions as it supports both PDB and PDBx/mmCIF formats.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNApdbee 2.0 and El Tetrado enable the analysis of quadruplexes that could be useful for studying telomeric motifs that are often associated with cancer and neurodegenerative diseases [34,36]. Motif analysis on ribosomal structures that are of low resolution could benefit from the method employed by CompAnnotate [32]. For tertiary structure analyses that require a wider range of motif annotations, users can opt for WebFR3D, RNA Frabase 2.0, and NASSAM [9,18,22,26,28,30,35].…”
Section: Comparison Of Computational Approaches In Annotating Rna Base Motifsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the main reasons for the lag in long-range motif exploration are the limitations of existing computational methods designed for the motif search problem, which is formulated as the task of identifying instances of a given 3D motif within a given RNA 3D structure or a set of structures [11,[13][14][15][16][17][18]. The commonly used methods are limited by at least one of three major restraints: RNA sequence (types of bases) [14,15], annotations of interactions (e.g., types of base pairs [19]) [13,15,16,18,20], and backbone topology (types of loops [21,22]) [11,12,14,16,17,[23][24][25]. Sequence restraints may hide rare non-canonical motif variants, such as the U-minor variant of the A-minor interaction motif [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%