2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2012.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparación de la calidad de imagen y dosis de radiación en angio-tomografía computarizada de arterias periféricas con 80 y 100kV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the lower CM dose used in our current study, IMR, combined with the lower tube voltage, also increased the CT value compared to that of the FBP group. These results are consistent with previous studies of low tube voltage, which show increased CT values in the vessels 26 , 27 . Moreover, the excessive volume of the CM is closely related to CM-induced nephropathy and a higher extravasation rate 24 , 28 , 29 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Despite the lower CM dose used in our current study, IMR, combined with the lower tube voltage, also increased the CT value compared to that of the FBP group. These results are consistent with previous studies of low tube voltage, which show increased CT values in the vessels 26 , 27 . Moreover, the excessive volume of the CM is closely related to CM-induced nephropathy and a higher extravasation rate 24 , 28 , 29 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, the fast scan speed may outrun the contrast bolus, and therefore, large quantities of contrast volume are not essential for vascular studies [ 5 ]. Furthermore, low kilovoltage (kVp) levels have been shown to improve contrast enhancement in CTA [ 6 , 7 ]. The disadvantages of this procedure lie in the beam hardening artefacts and the increase of image noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the increasing concern regarding radiogenic risk to patients during CTA procedures, a number of studies have been published internationally, which have focused on patient radiation during CTA procedures due to the large anatomic volumes included and acquisition of thinner slices. A large variability in patient radiation dose has been reported (Mafalanka et al, 2015, Brenner and Hall, 2007, Berrington de Gonzalez et al, 2009, Oca Pernas et al, 2014, Sabarudin and Sun, 2013). Further, it has been reported that patient effective doses during CTA procedures range between 2.2 and 24.4 mSv (Mafalanka et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%