2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12524-018-0805-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analyses of the Point Cloud Produced by Using Close-Range Photogrammetry and Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Rock Surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality of the 3D reconstruction heavily depends on the completeness and accuracy of dense point cloud generated (Mostegel, 2011). The point cloud comparison between Close Range Photogrammetry (CRP) and TLS showed that the difference in accuracy is considerably small (Harwin & Lucieer, 2012;Incekara & Seker, 2018;James & Quinton, 2014;Murtiyoso & Grussenmeyer, 2017). This is true when images are captured with ambient illumination conditions, and the surface is textured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the 3D reconstruction heavily depends on the completeness and accuracy of dense point cloud generated (Mostegel, 2011). The point cloud comparison between Close Range Photogrammetry (CRP) and TLS showed that the difference in accuracy is considerably small (Harwin & Lucieer, 2012;Incekara & Seker, 2018;James & Quinton, 2014;Murtiyoso & Grussenmeyer, 2017). This is true when images are captured with ambient illumination conditions, and the surface is textured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%