2010
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2010.212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of DNA-based microbial community composition and substrate utilisation patterns of activated sludge microorganisms from wastewater treatment plants operated under different conditions

Abstract: In this study, the microbial community structure and carbon source utilisation profile of activated sludge samples collected from full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) operated under different conditions were characterised and compared, respectively, using terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis and Biolog assay. Samples were collected from each biological treatment tank of six conventional activated sludge, two anaerobic-oxic, two anaerobic-anoxic-oxic, and one s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of H'(T-RFLP) (Blackwood et al, 2007) and H'(Biolog) (Al-Mutairi, 2007) were calculated respectively from T-RF and carbon source utilization profiles as described previously (Matsuda et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The values of H'(T-RFLP) (Blackwood et al, 2007) and H'(Biolog) (Al-Mutairi, 2007) were calculated respectively from T-RF and carbon source utilization profiles as described previously (Matsuda et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.3.4.; http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past). Carbon source utilization profiles and T-RF profiles of 12 MBRs were compared with those of 11 conventional processes obtained in the previous study (Matsuda et al, 2010). The datasets were prepared using the same calculation method as that described by Matsuda et al (2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations