Hybrid and Electric Vehicles Conference 2013 (HEVC 2013) 2013
DOI: 10.1049/cp.2013.1920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of forward-facing models vs backward-facing models in powertrain component sizing

Abstract: Powertrain size optimisation based on vehicle class and usage profile is advantageous for reducing emissions. Backwardfacing powertrain models, which incorporate scalable powertrain components, have often been used for this purpose. However, due to their quasi-static nature, backwardfacing models give very limited information about the limits of the system and drivability of the vehicle. This makes it difficult for control system development and implementation in hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) test systems. This p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 shows a diagram of these modeling techniques. The literature contains some discussion of the merits and disadvantages of the two [8,9]: "forward-facing" models can contain considerably more detail (in particular dynamics), but this has to be traded-off against the fact that quasi-static; "backwards-facing" models execute much more quickly. In some sources, the models which must be free from dynamics are expressed as algebraic equations [6]: if the driving cycle is fixed, it is often possible to express the energy consumed as a pure function of several parameters:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows a diagram of these modeling techniques. The literature contains some discussion of the merits and disadvantages of the two [8,9]: "forward-facing" models can contain considerably more detail (in particular dynamics), but this has to be traded-off against the fact that quasi-static; "backwards-facing" models execute much more quickly. In some sources, the models which must be free from dynamics are expressed as algebraic equations [6]: if the driving cycle is fixed, it is often possible to express the energy consumed as a pure function of several parameters:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar approach is also found in [121]. In fact, Assadian et al [122] state that powertrain component size optimisation could be possible with forward-facing simulations when integrating the driver model control parameters into the optimisation. The premise, however, is that both the driver and the load side are easily modelled and that the increased computational effort can be handled.…”
Section: Conceptual Design Of Complex Hydromechanical Transmissionsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In contrast, forward-facing models contain a driver representation, components are operated based on control inputs and sufficient vehicle performance is not guaranteed. Backward-facing models can typically be simulated quicker, while the forward-facing approach can amongst others capture system dynamics and the actual vehicle performance and the effect of a control strategy [69,70]. Common simulation software products to model in particular HHV transmissions include Matlab/Simulink [71], Advisor [72,69,73,74], an analysis-focused tool based on the former, which was developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and Amesim [75], a commercial software for modelling multi-domain systems.…”
Section: Modelling Of a Series Hydraulic Hybrid Vehicle Transmissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic models in Hopsan are typically one-dimensional and apply the forward-facing simulation principle. These kinds of models can offer better understanding of the physical system than their backward-facing counterparts [70,73], but require smaller simulation time steps. In principle, the use of Transmission Line Modelling (TLM) [78] in Hopsan should, however, allow for increased simulation performance on multi-core processors [79]; this has not been analysed or targeted within the scope of this thesis.…”
Section: Modelling Of a Series Hydraulic Hybrid Vehicle Transmissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation