2016
DOI: 10.1159/000449447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Gene Regulatory Network Components in the Auditory Hindbrain of Mice and Chicken

Abstract: The neurons in the mammalian and avian auditory hindbrain nuclei share a number of significant morphological and physiological properties for fast, secure and precise neurotransmission, such as giant synapses, voltage-gated K+ channels and fast AMPA receptors. Based on the independent evolution of the middle ear in these two vertebrate lineages, on different embryonic origins of the nuclei and on marked differences on the circuit level, these similarities are assumed to reflect convergent evolution.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both miRNAs belong to the miRNA cluster miR-183, miR-96 and miR-182, which is transcribed as a polycistronic transcript. Indeed, miR-183 showed a similar expression pattern as miR-96 in the auditory hindbrain (Pawlik et al 2016). A mutation in miR-96 causes reduced cell size, altered electrophysiological properties, changes in gene expression and impaired maturation of a giant synapse in the auditory hindbrain (Schlüter et al Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both miRNAs belong to the miRNA cluster miR-183, miR-96 and miR-182, which is transcribed as a polycistronic transcript. Indeed, miR-183 showed a similar expression pattern as miR-96 in the auditory hindbrain (Pawlik et al 2016). A mutation in miR-96 causes reduced cell size, altered electrophysiological properties, changes in gene expression and impaired maturation of a giant synapse in the auditory hindbrain (Schlüter et al Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specificity of the probes was indicated by their different expression patterns. Furthermore, more than 40 sense probes in previous studies using the same protocol provided negative results (Ehmann et al 2013;Pawlik et al 2016).…”
Section: Rna In Situ Hybridization (Qualitative Analysis Of Mirna Expmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…RNA probe generation was conducted similarly to previous studies (Krohs et al, 2020; Pawlik et al, 2016). Sequences corresponding to pre‐miRNAs flanked by additional 25–75 nucleotides were amplified by PCR from chicken genomic DNA with corresponding primer pairs (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the importance of GRN components, we have begun to establish comparative expression maps of these factors. Analysis of selected transcription factors showed a highly similar expression pattern in chicken and mice auditory hindbrain nuclei (Pawlik et al, 2016). The highly dynamic nature during development and evolution make microRNAs (miRNAs) another interesting entry point to such comparative studies (Bartel, 2018; Kittelmann & McGregor, 2019; Kosik & Nowakowski, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-sections of 20 µm thickness were cut on a cryostat (HM 400, Microm, Waldorf, Germany or CM1950, Leica Biosystems) and sections were stored at −80°C until use. On-slide in situ hybridization was performed at 50-60°C overnight in hybridization buffer [50% formamide, 5× SSC, 2% blocker (Roche), 0.02% SDS, 0.1% N-lauryl sarcosine; Wilms et al, 2016;Pawlik et al, 2016]. Bound probes were detected with an antidigoxigenin antibody conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (Roche).…”
Section: Rna In Situ Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 99%