2021
DOI: 10.20473/jisebi.7.1.56-66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Image Classification Algorithms for Face Mask Detection

Abstract: Background: The COVID-19 pandemic remains a problem in 2021. Health protocols are needed to prevent the spread, including wearing a face mask. Enforcing people to wear face masks is tiring. AI can be used to classify images for face mask detection. There are a lot of image classification algorithm for face mask detection, but there are still no studies that compare their performance.Objective: This study aims to compare the classification algorithms of classical machine learning. They are k-nearest neighbors (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to their experimental results, MobileNet Mask achieved about 93% accuracy with 770 validation samples, and about 100% with 276 validation samples. Naufal et al (2021) conducted a comparative study on face mask detection using support vector machines (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and deep CNNs (DCNN). Although CNN required a longer execution time compared to KNN and SVM, it reported the best average performance, with an accuracy of 96,83%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to their experimental results, MobileNet Mask achieved about 93% accuracy with 770 validation samples, and about 100% with 276 validation samples. Naufal et al (2021) conducted a comparative study on face mask detection using support vector machines (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and deep CNNs (DCNN). Although CNN required a longer execution time compared to KNN and SVM, it reported the best average performance, with an accuracy of 96,83%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes exploiting traditional ML models are not reasonable to extract features, whereas in DL-based models, the task is performed automatically in the hidden layers. However, extracting features intelligently is an essential task during cyberbullying detection from text and image [15][16][17][18]. In addition, understanding the context of the text or images increases the chance of providing better accuracy [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DTs are a common component of many medical diagnostic regimens, as they are simple to understand and learn. When traversing the tree for the classification of a sample, the outcomes of all tests at each node along the path provides sufficient information to make a conjecture about its class [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%