2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2008.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of nutritional composition between herbicide-tolerant rice with bar gene and its non-transgenic counterpart

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant (p>0.05) differences were observed in the phytic acid content between Agb0103 rice and non-transgenic rice. The inhibitory activity of trypsin inhibitors was low in all rice samples, in agreement with previous reports (10,17,29).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…No significant (p>0.05) differences were observed in the phytic acid content between Agb0103 rice and non-transgenic rice. The inhibitory activity of trypsin inhibitors was low in all rice samples, in agreement with previous reports (10,17,29).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Some examples of GM products that passed the substantial equivalence test include a maize line with the sb401 gene incorporated to increase lysine content, the equivalent test with a conventional protein quality maize (Nongda 108) showed that the lysine-rich maize was safe (Tang et al, 2013). The compositional equivalence of a herbicide-tolerant rice (Bar 68-1) exhibited no significant differences, when compared with its isoline (D68) (Li et al, 2008). The evaluation of a Bt soybean (products Mon 87701 * Mon 89,788) that confers pest resistance and glyphosate resistance, concluded that Bt soybean was as safe as its traditional counterparts (Berman et al, 2009).…”
Section: Feed Safety Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lipid content of diet and gut content was measured by petroleum ether extraction using a Soxtec System (2055 Soxtec Avanti; Foss Teacator, Hoganas, Sweden). Carbohydrate levels of dry weight were calculated by the formula following Xin et al (2008):…”
Section: Nutrient Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%