2018 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Communication, Computer, and Optimization Techniques (ICEECCOT) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iceeccot43722.2018.9001544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of TCSC and STATCOM in Power System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where "i" represents iteration number, "w" is the inertial weight, rand 1 and rand 2 are random numbers in the range of [0, 1], "c2" and "c1" are acceleration coefficients ranging between [1,2] and "s" represents the particle position. "w" is updated in every iteration using Equation (25).…”
Section: Particle Swarm Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where "i" represents iteration number, "w" is the inertial weight, rand 1 and rand 2 are random numbers in the range of [0, 1], "c2" and "c1" are acceleration coefficients ranging between [1,2] and "s" represents the particle position. "w" is updated in every iteration using Equation (25).…”
Section: Particle Swarm Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVC requires less installation costs as compared to UPFC, hence SVC installation is the most appropriate choice for voltage stability [24]. Similarly, TCSC is more reliable as compared to STAT-COM for long-distance transmission lines [25]. When SVCs are compared to STAT-COM, STAT-COM gives efficient results at a higher cost [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%