2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822012000200001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of the intracerebral mouse protection test and serological method for potency assays of pertussis component in DTP vaccine

Abstract: The aim of this study was to compare the PSPT standardized in-house as an alternative to MPT for potency assays of pertussis component. Statistical analyses have showed similar pertussis potency values when PSPT was compared to MPT. Significant correlation between the potency results obtained by in vivo and in vitro assays was also been observed. Results by PSPT have demonstrated reproducibility and accuracy for potency pertussis control and this approach has been considered promising for use at least during t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Serological potency tests for wP vaccines in mice and guinea pigs have been reported in a number of publications [89][90][91][92][93]. Such assays have the potential to reduce the overall severity of animal procedures used in assessing the potency of wP vaccines, but, at the moment, there remain a number of unresolved issues.…”
Section: Serological Potency Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serological potency tests for wP vaccines in mice and guinea pigs have been reported in a number of publications [89][90][91][92][93]. Such assays have the potential to reduce the overall severity of animal procedures used in assessing the potency of wP vaccines, but, at the moment, there remain a number of unresolved issues.…”
Section: Serological Potency Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the intracerebral mouse protection test (MPT.Ic) or Kendrick's test was the subject of our study, in order to develop the activity control of monovalent pertussis vaccines or associated with other antigens, and marketed in Algeria. However, and despite the variability that characterizes the mouse protection test (MPT), and the development of several alternative methods, such as the serological potency assay [25][26][27][28], the intra-nasal respiratory challenge test [29,30], and the nitric oxide and hydrogen superoxide assay [31,32], the (MPT) test remains the official potency test and the reference method for assessing the potency of pertussis vaccines [24]. In addition, it was the only test that shows a relationship with protection against pertussis in children in clinical trials [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%