2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2010.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of three chemometric techniques for the spectroradiometric assessment of canopy chlorophyll content in winter wheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
167
1
17

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
12
167
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results (Figure 7) show that MLR is more sensitive to noise than PLSR, which is consistent with the findings of Zhao et al [91]. The results of Atzberger et al [7] indicate that the noise immunity of PCR, PLSR, and SMLR is ranked as PCR > PLSR > MLR, which is exactly the same ranking as obtained in the present work ( Figure 7). The present noise immunity results ( Figure 7) are important because repeated observations by remote-sensing techniques occur at different times; so techniques with poor noise immunity may lead to low accuracy because of data errors [26,78,79] (e.g., due to atmosphere, clouds, observation times, sensor noise).…”
Section: Analysis Of Noise Immunitysupporting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our results (Figure 7) show that MLR is more sensitive to noise than PLSR, which is consistent with the findings of Zhao et al [91]. The results of Atzberger et al [7] indicate that the noise immunity of PCR, PLSR, and SMLR is ranked as PCR > PLSR > MLR, which is exactly the same ranking as obtained in the present work ( Figure 7). The present noise immunity results ( Figure 7) are important because repeated observations by remote-sensing techniques occur at different times; so techniques with poor noise immunity may lead to low accuracy because of data errors [26,78,79] (e.g., due to atmosphere, clouds, observation times, sensor noise).…”
Section: Analysis Of Noise Immunitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the To evaluate how sensor noise and other uncertainty sources affect these data-analysis techniques, we simulate the internal noise (dark current, random noise) of a CCD used for remote sensing. We add random noise to the validation VIs to analyze how remote-sensing noise affects the stability of these techniques with the help of white Gaussian noise [7]. These models to estimate the AGB use the original VIs and are validated by using VIs with noise added.…”
Section: Modeling Parameters and Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations