2005
DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfi006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Within-Household Respondent Selection Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
76
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The selection of the respondent within the selected household was done using the "last birthday" principle. It is proven by practice that the sample produced by this method does not differ significantly from the official statistical data on age, gender and other demographic parameters (Gaziano 2005;Oldendick et al 1988). Altogether 1,376 respondents were contacted, and 330 refused to complete the questionnaire.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The selection of the respondent within the selected household was done using the "last birthday" principle. It is proven by practice that the sample produced by this method does not differ significantly from the official statistical data on age, gender and other demographic parameters (Gaziano 2005;Oldendick et al 1988). Altogether 1,376 respondents were contacted, and 330 refused to complete the questionnaire.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…When conducting an RDD telephone survey, researchers are usually interested in obtaining a random sample of the population of people rather than a random sample of households. In order to do this, interviewers select one household member using one of various techniques (see Gaziano 2005 andRizzo, Brick, andPark 2004 for reviews). Acquiring a roster of all eligible members of the household permits randomly selecting one person to be interviewed, yielding equal probability of selection.…”
Section: Who To Interviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This move to self-administered modes presents a special challenge to survey researchers: how to maintain a probability sample of adults within a household without an interviewer to administer a within-household selection procedure. Although a wide body of literature exists for within-household selection methods for telephone surveys (Oldendick et al 1988;Lind, Link, and Oldendick 2000;Gaziano 2005;Yan 2009), empirical research on within-household selection in mail surveys is much sparser (e.g., Reich, Yates, and Woolson 1986;Battaglia et al 2008). The present study addresses this gap by using two experimental mail surveys to examine four within-household selection methods: the next-birthday, last-birthday, oldest-adult, and youngest-adult methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the next-and last-birthday methods, the selected respondent is the person in the household with the birthday that is immediately upcoming (next) or has most recently occurred (last). These are quasi-probability methods of within-household selection, as opposed to probability methods such as Kish's household roster (Gaziano 2005). Although Battaglia et al (2008) examined the next-birthday method and Schnell, Ziniel, and Coutts (2007) examined the last-birthday method in mail surveys, to our knowledge no previous studies have compared these selection procedures in the same study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation