2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-021-01275-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis on macroscale material models for the prediction of masonry in-plane behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The failure criteria define the elastic limit of a material subjected to a complex stress state [8,9,13]. The fundamental problem is to relate the critical parameters of the material obtained with simple uniaxial tests, with the resistance of the material subjected to multiaxial stress regimes.…”
Section: Failure Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The failure criteria define the elastic limit of a material subjected to a complex stress state [8,9,13]. The fundamental problem is to relate the critical parameters of the material obtained with simple uniaxial tests, with the resistance of the material subjected to multiaxial stress regimes.…”
Section: Failure Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the possible failure criteria present in the literature several works demonstrated that the Concrete Damaged Plasticity Model (CDP) is easily adaptable to all the material having brittle behaviour such as masonry, but these claims have hardly been validated by comparison with experimental tests on entire wall panels or entire masonry structures [4][5][6]. Another model which can be used for the definition of the macromechanical behaviour of the brittle anisotropic materials is the Drucker Prager (DP) [7][8][9][10][11] whose main lack is the loosing of accuracy in presence of large displacement as the model is not able to catch the variation of the cohesion as a function of the plastic deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the number of different material models developed over the years and implemented in structural computer codes has raised concerns on the objectivity of the results obtained. As a consequence, the assessment of advanced numerical models has been become a topic of increasing interest in the scientific community [95,96]. Acknowledging the different hypotheses at the base of the models, and the selection of material parameters should be considered model-dependent [97], and appropriate tests should be carried out to estimate them.…”
Section: Pros and Cons Of Different Detail Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of troubles in numerical modeling and excessive computation requirements, the micro-model is appropriate for small-scale simulations [11]. Therefore, homogenization techniques are addressed, in which it is not possible to distinguish masonry units and mortar joints from each other and masonry constructions can be modeled in an integrated manner [12,13]. The simpli ed macro modeling homogenized strategy is very promising in analyzing large-volume models and is applicable for the safety assessment of masonry constructions in engineering practice due to adequacy and computational e ciency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%