2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-006-9084-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative and pharmacophore model for deacetylase SIRT1

Abstract: Sirtuins are NAD-dependent histone deacetylases, which cleave the acetyl-group from acetylated proteins, such as histones but also the acetyl groups from several transcription factors, and in this way can change their activities. Of all seven mammalian SirTs, the human sirtuin SirT1 has been the most extensively studied. However, there is no crystal structure or comparative model reported for SirT1. We have therefore built up a three-dimensional comparison model of the SirT1 protein catalytic core (domain area… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this is retained by Salermide, suggesting that this drug could constitute a better inhibitor than sirtinol, as earlier experiments showed that Q167 is crucial for HDAC-Sirt2 activity (Finnin et al, 2001). In addition, it is noted that these key binding residues also match one of those reported for EX527 and Sirt1, Q345 (Q167 correspondingly on Sirt2) (Huhtiniemi et al, 2006). Quantification of their corresponding interactions with Sirt2, docking fitness function and a more detailed analysis after energy minimization suggests that Salermide-the stronger inhibitor-may have a higher binding affinity than sirtinol.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this is retained by Salermide, suggesting that this drug could constitute a better inhibitor than sirtinol, as earlier experiments showed that Q167 is crucial for HDAC-Sirt2 activity (Finnin et al, 2001). In addition, it is noted that these key binding residues also match one of those reported for EX527 and Sirt1, Q345 (Q167 correspondingly on Sirt2) (Huhtiniemi et al, 2006). Quantification of their corresponding interactions with Sirt2, docking fitness function and a more detailed analysis after energy minimization suggests that Salermide-the stronger inhibitor-may have a higher binding affinity than sirtinol.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The available experimental information was considered to define the docking area to be explored; thus, the docking region used was a 10-Å sphere around the oxygen O of Gln167, the Sirt2 C-pocket (Finnin et al, 2001;Min et al, 2001;Avalos et al, 2005;Huhtiniemi et al, 2006). For Salermide, all proposed solutions converged to the same binding area and mode, involving the same residues; however, different solutions emerged for sirtinol, and the five highest-ranking solutions were selected for further analyses.…”
Section: D Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, although our results provide qualitative comparisons with a recent report by Lara et al (28), the precise binding modes of the inhibitors differ. Moreover, computational studies by Huhtiniemi et al (39) suggest that the conformational freedom of the "flexible loop" region of the C-pocket may play a crucial role in substrate binding, something that is not taken into account using static docking techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ile347 and Ile348 were extensively residue domain to binding pocket for the ligand. 26 The results of the hydrogen bond analysis also show that residual Ile347 and Asp348 have high occupancy that plays a role in inhibitor activity. Based on research results the 5-oxocoronaridine and dregamine compounds are potential candidates for SIRT1 inhibitors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%