2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative antioxidant capacities of phenolic compounds measured by various tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

33
246
3
12

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 384 publications
(294 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
33
246
3
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Phenolic content generally correlates with antioxidant capacities measured by DPPH or ABTS methods (Tabart et al 2009). Other studies indicate that the DPPH assay effectively determines the most reactive antioxidant components (Kim et al 2002), whereas the ABTS* assay measures the antioxidant activity of a wider range of polyphenolic compounds (Re et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenolic content generally correlates with antioxidant capacities measured by DPPH or ABTS methods (Tabart et al 2009). Other studies indicate that the DPPH assay effectively determines the most reactive antioxidant components (Kim et al 2002), whereas the ABTS* assay measures the antioxidant activity of a wider range of polyphenolic compounds (Re et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 The ranking order for the antioxidant assay obtained after the weighted average calculation was A. prunifolia > AmV > AmA.…”
Section: Antioxidant Activitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The majority of authors evaluated DPPH activity via evaluation of EC 50 (the sample concentration necessary to reduce the initial DPPH activity to 50%), or percentage inhibition (%). DPPH has been widely used for free radical-scavenging assessments due to its simplicity and convenience.…”
Section: Fruit Antioxidant Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the antioxidant activity measured by an individual assay reflects only the chemical reactivity under the specific conditions applied in that assay, as pointed out by many authors [48][49][50][51][52], it is inappropriate and misleading to generalize the data obtained by a single method as indicators of antioxidant activity. There are no standardized assays for determining antioxidant capacity of any sample, and their "importance" or usefulness depends exclusively on the mechanism of action of antioxidants expected to be found in the particular sample.…”
Section: Fruit Antioxidant Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%