2016
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e16-01-0063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative assessment of fluorescent proteins for in vivo imaging in an animal model system

Abstract: Fluorescent protein tags are the primary tool for labeling gene products and analyzing their dynamics using live-cell imaging. A quantitative comparison is made of fluorescent protein brightness and photostability in an in vivo animal model system, and tools and recommendations are given for optimal fluorescent protein selection.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
104
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
104
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the properties of these new fluorophores are generally characterized in bacteria or cell culture systems, and are not always retained in C. elegans cells or in specific subcellular compartments (Heppert et al 2016). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the properties of these new fluorophores are generally characterized in bacteria or cell culture systems, and are not always retained in C. elegans cells or in specific subcellular compartments (Heppert et al 2016). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the pioneering use of green fluorescent protein (GFP) in C. elegans (Chalfie et al 1994), a number of fluorescent protein tags have been developed (for a comparative analysis of some of the currently available fluorescent probes, see Heppert et al 2016). Both intron insertion and codon optimization are important for robust fluorescent protein expression, especially in the germline (Green et al 2008).…”
Section: Engineering Cell Division Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years mNeonGreen, isolated from a lancelet, has emerged as a compelling alternative to green fluorescent protein (Shaner et al 2013). In our hands, mNeonGreen has improved the signal-to-noise ratio when fused to proteins such as cyclin B (CYB-1) (Kim et al 2017), although any potential improvement will depend on the target protein and/or the tissue/subcellular compartment in which it is expressed (Heppert et al 2016). …”
Section: Engineering Cell Division Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, we describe the currently and commercially available filters that can be used to rebuild these GFP-filter settings. In contrast to the single band FITC GFP filter set, the proposed triple band GFP filter set has a very narrow excitation bandwidth of 10 nm, which is right by the maximum peak for the S65C mutant GFP excitation (488 nm) that is commonly used in C. elegans (Boulin et al , 2006; Heppert et al , 2016). More importantly, the emission filter used here has a first pass-through (520/20 nm) for the light emitted close to the GFP emission peak (509 nm) and a second pass-through (595/40 nm) from the light around the autofluorescence emission, allowing the separation of GFP (visible in green) and autofluorescence (visible in yellow).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%