2017
DOI: 10.4103/jfo.jfds_4_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative assessment of maxillary canine index and maxillary first molar dimensions for sex determination in forensic odontology

Abstract: Background:Sexual identification of immature skeletal remains is still a difficult problem to solve in forensic anthropology. In such situations, the odontometric features of the teeth can be of immense help. Teeth, being the hardest and chemically the most stable tissue in the body, are an excellent material in living and nonliving populations for anthropological, genetic, odontologic, and forensic investigations. Using tooth size standards, whenever it is possible to predict the sex, identification is made e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, several teeth are sexually dimorphic and the crown mesiodistal dimensions were larger on average in males than in females. The results of this study confirm what was previously demonstrated, canine teeth are the most dimorphic teeth [1][2][3][4][5]7,19,21,[24][25][26] but also molars present significant differences between sexes [11,13,23,25,[28][29][30]. Within the elements that fit into our sex prediction model, the upper left canine, the lower right lateral incisor, and the lower right canine were the most appropriate and with better replicability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, several teeth are sexually dimorphic and the crown mesiodistal dimensions were larger on average in males than in females. The results of this study confirm what was previously demonstrated, canine teeth are the most dimorphic teeth [1][2][3][4][5]7,19,21,[24][25][26] but also molars present significant differences between sexes [11,13,23,25,[28][29][30]. Within the elements that fit into our sex prediction model, the upper left canine, the lower right lateral incisor, and the lower right canine were the most appropriate and with better replicability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Dental crown dimensions can be obtained through intraoral measurements [18], dental forms [4,11,13,14,16,19,24], or human remains [20,21]. The mesiodistal and buccolingual measurements of the crown were the two most commonly used and studied dimensions [1,11,14,[18][19][20][21], followed by diagonal measurements (mesiobuccal-distolingual and distobuccal-mesiolingual) [1,21,25] and the canine mandibular index (expressed as the ratio between the mesiodistal dimension of the canines and the width of the intercanine arch [12,15,19,26]). These studies have shown that canine dimensions provide the highest sexual dimorphism [16,18,21,24,25], followed by premolars [21,25], first and second molars [20,21,25,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that there is also an MCI using the same measurements except in the upper dentition (Bakkannavar et al, 2015;Nuhu et al, 2019;Otuagn et al, 2019;Phulari et al, 2017;Rani, 2017). In previous studies, it was found that the Maxillary Index results were not as significant as the Mandibular Index ones and thus not as accurate at assessing sex within the Indian populations (Nuhu et al, 2019;Otuagna et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In previous studies, it was found that the Maxillary Index results were not as significant as the Mandibular Index ones and thus not as accurate at assessing sex within the Indian populations (Nuhu et al, 2019;Otuagna et al, 2019). Other studies found that the Maxillary Canine Index was not significant at all and should not be used as a sexing method (Bakkannavar et al, 2015;Phulari et al, 2017). Due to these limitations, the Maxillary Canine Index was not assessed for this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%