2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative assessment of the measures of thematic classification accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
223
0
12

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
223
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…11. Karta promjena u načinu upotrebe i pokrovu zemljišta 1978. -2007 decrease by 5 % was from 1992-2007.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11. Karta promjena u načinu upotrebe i pokrovu zemljišta 1978. -2007 decrease by 5 % was from 1992-2007.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The error matrix is the most widely used approach for image classification accuracy assessment and can be used to derive a series of descriptive and analytical statistics (Congalton and Mead;Congalton, 1991;Congalton and Green, 1999;Smits et al, 1999;Congalton and Plourde, 2002;Foody, 2002;Liu et al, 2007). In this study, accuracy assessment was performed for the classified maps of all three time steps.…”
Section: Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even in this context, kappa does not provide a measure of the model's predictive ability, and alternatives to kappa should be considered for this purpose (DeMast, 2007). Liu et al (2007) provide a comprehensive review and analysis of other proposed accuracy measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be also noticed that the same ROIs were used for Accuracy assessment has been a topic of considerable debate and research in remote sensing for many years. This is in part because the promoted standard methods such as the Kappa coefficient are not always appropriate [45]. Several researchers have worked on the problems relative to accuracy assessment of classification uncertainty [46][47][48].…”
Section: Case Study Area 2: Mironikitas Areamentioning
confidence: 99%