1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf03189964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative bioavailability and in-vitro antimicrobial activity of two different brands of rifampicin

Abstract: A comparative bioavailability study was undertaken between a new formulation of rifampicin 'Famcin' and a standard formulation of rifampicin 'R-cin' in eight healthy male volunteers at two dose levels: 300 mg and 450 mg given orally under both single dose and steady state conditions. Plasma rifampicin was assayed spectrophotometrically. The study documented comparable rate and extent of bioavailability. (Cmax, Tmax and AUC0-infinity) and elimination half-lives (t1/2) of the two brands of rifampicin when compar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of present bioequivalence study support the results of several former studies showing large inter‐individual variability in rifampicin bioavailability (3, 5). The AUC values of different volunteers differed more than three‐fold.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of present bioequivalence study support the results of several former studies showing large inter‐individual variability in rifampicin bioavailability (3, 5). The AUC values of different volunteers differed more than three‐fold.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The main rifampicin products in Estonia were Rifampicin from Belmedpreparaty, Belorussia (RB) and Rifampicin, Lupin Laboratories Ltd, India (RL). In our preparatory literature survey we were unable to find any data about RB; one bioequivalence study of RL has been published but in this experiment the drug of comparison was a new unknown generic preparation (5). The aim of the present study was to compare the relative bioavailabilities of two generic rifampicin preparations, RB and RL, with that of Rimactane (Ciba‐Geigy Ltd, Switzerland).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…HPLC was used to measure rifampicin levels in 66 of the 70 studies. The remaining studies used spectrophotometry 33–35 or a plate diffusion assay. 36 These three studies were retained in the meta-analysis because their exclusion did not significantly impact overall PK parameter estimates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we were not able to consider the impact of covariates that were not consistently measured on heterogeneity in PK estimates. These included co-medications and associated drug–drug interactions, specific formulations of rifampicin that have been demonstrated to exhibit altered PK, 33 , 45 , 46 and patient ethnicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%