1985
DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(85)90082-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative characteristics of unit activity in the prefrontal and parietal areas during delayed performance in monkeys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in line with earlier literature on electrophysiological recordings in monkeys suggesting a role for the PFC in WM processes and temporal integration of information (Fuster 1973(Fuster , 1997Goldman-Rakic 1987;Funahashi et al 1989;Fuster et al 2000). The proportion of neurons that, in the control condition, responded spatially selectively during the delay period (7%) or during both cue and delay periods (7% ; Table 1) is comparable to earlier electrophysiological studies in monkeys in which neuronal activity was recorded in the PFC during a spatial delayed response or DMTS task with 2 locations (e.g., Niki 1974;Batuev et al 1985;Artchakov et al 2007). When more than 2 locations were used as memoranda the proportion of neurons exhibiting spatial selectivity during the delay has been higher (Funahashi et al 1989).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This finding is in line with earlier literature on electrophysiological recordings in monkeys suggesting a role for the PFC in WM processes and temporal integration of information (Fuster 1973(Fuster , 1997Goldman-Rakic 1987;Funahashi et al 1989;Fuster et al 2000). The proportion of neurons that, in the control condition, responded spatially selectively during the delay period (7%) or during both cue and delay periods (7% ; Table 1) is comparable to earlier electrophysiological studies in monkeys in which neuronal activity was recorded in the PFC during a spatial delayed response or DMTS task with 2 locations (e.g., Niki 1974;Batuev et al 1985;Artchakov et al 2007). When more than 2 locations were used as memoranda the proportion of neurons exhibiting spatial selectivity during the delay has been higher (Funahashi et al 1989).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…These potentials were recorded during the delay period of a delayedresponse task-a period requiring the location of a target stimulus to be remembered. Studies of single cell functioning in monkeys have shown persistent firing of prefrontal and parietal neurons during delay periods in which target location must be remembered (Batuev et al, 1985;Chafee and Goldman-Rakic, 2000). Consistent with these findings, positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have shown enhanced activation in the prefrontal and parietal cortices in humans during spatial working-memory tasks (Jonides et al, 1993;Rowe et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The other is the connectionist view that emphasizes parallel distributed neural networks in mediation of complex cognitive processes (Edelman and Mouncastle, 1978;Goldman-Rakic, 1988;Damasio, 1989;Mesulam, 1990;Fuster, 2003). This view is supported by substantial morphological evidence (eg, Selemon and Goldman-Rakic, 1988) as well as electrophysiological recordings in behaving animals and functional-imaging studies in humans (Fuster and Alexander, 1971;Batuev et al, 1985;Goldman-Rakic, 1988;Treue and Maunsell, 1996;Dolan et al, 1997;Friston, 2002;Gruber et al, 2007). Contemporary approaches to cortical function consider both types of processing relevant and generally assume that modular processing is a manifestation of parallel computational networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%