2004
DOI: 10.1191/1078155204jp140oa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative contamination study with cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil and ifosfamide: standard technique versus a proprietary closed-handling system

Abstract: technique versus a proprietary closed-handling system Comparative contamination study with cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil and ifosfamide: standard Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com can be found at: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice Additional services and information for

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of background data were not collected in most of the previously published studies. 27,33,34,36 Despite generally low levels of surface contamination in all three pharmacies, levels high enough to warrant corrective action did occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This type of background data were not collected in most of the previously published studies. 27,33,34,36 Despite generally low levels of surface contamination in all three pharmacies, levels high enough to warrant corrective action did occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This finding was similar to several other reports of surface contamination with cyclophosphamide. 18,27,35,36 We believe these higher levels to be the result of breaches in technique, though none of the preparers reported problems with manipulation of the CSTD when queried following completion of the CSTD Phase. Surface contamination in this range has been associated with the presence of cyclophosphamide in the urine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2003; Poirier et al. 2004; Tans and Willems 2004). However, data are scarce on the microbiological barrier function of this and other systems, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yapılan çalışmaların sonucunda, antineoplastik ilaçların hazırlanmasında açık ve kapalı sistemlerin olumsuz etkileri açısından kıyaslanması yapılmış ve kapalı sistemle ilaç hazırlamanın çevre ve çalışan sağlığı açısından olumsuz etkileri azalttığına ilişkin kanıtlar bulunmuştur(Connor ve ark., 2002; Wick ve ark. 2003;Spivey and Connor, 2003;Tans and Willems, 2004). Dünya'da ve ülkemizde antineoplastik ilaçların hazırlanması, uygulanması, taşınması ve yönetimi konusunda bir çok standart ve prosedür olmasına karşın istenen düzeyde uygulanmadığı görülmektedir.…”
unclassified