2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative economic and life cycle assessment of solar-based hydrogen production for oil and gas industries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was reported that global warming potential varied from -85 kg CO 2 eq/kg H 2 to 110 kg CO 2 eq/kg H 2 Reaño, 2020 The study compared alkali water electrolysis, gasification and dark fermentation for hydrogen production. The dark fermentation pathway was recorded as the most efficient process based on a net energy ratio of 1.25 and global warming potential as 46 kg CO 2 eq/kg of H 2 Sadeghi et al, 2020 The total greenhouse gas emissions were 10.28, 11.59, 3.08 and 2.06 kg CO 2 eq for 1 kg H 2 for steam methane reforming, coal gasification, photovoltaic electrolysis and solar thermal electrolysis, respectively Sako et al, 2021 This study compared the production of battery-assisted and conventional hydrogen production systems. It concluded that the battery-assisted hydrogen production had lower greenhouse gas emissions (0.15 to 0.3 kg CO 2 eq/kWh) compared to the conventional hydrogen production process (0.9 to 1.08 kg CO 2 eq/kWh) Sanchez, Ruiz et al 2021 The use of sugarcane press-mud, as a biomass source, had environmental benefits in comparison to the use of anhydrous ethanol from sugarcane molasses as feedstock for power generation using hydrogen as an energy vector.…”
Section: Key Findings and Recommendations For Future Life Cycle Assessment Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported that global warming potential varied from -85 kg CO 2 eq/kg H 2 to 110 kg CO 2 eq/kg H 2 Reaño, 2020 The study compared alkali water electrolysis, gasification and dark fermentation for hydrogen production. The dark fermentation pathway was recorded as the most efficient process based on a net energy ratio of 1.25 and global warming potential as 46 kg CO 2 eq/kg of H 2 Sadeghi et al, 2020 The total greenhouse gas emissions were 10.28, 11.59, 3.08 and 2.06 kg CO 2 eq for 1 kg H 2 for steam methane reforming, coal gasification, photovoltaic electrolysis and solar thermal electrolysis, respectively Sako et al, 2021 This study compared the production of battery-assisted and conventional hydrogen production systems. It concluded that the battery-assisted hydrogen production had lower greenhouse gas emissions (0.15 to 0.3 kg CO 2 eq/kWh) compared to the conventional hydrogen production process (0.9 to 1.08 kg CO 2 eq/kWh) Sanchez, Ruiz et al 2021 The use of sugarcane press-mud, as a biomass source, had environmental benefits in comparison to the use of anhydrous ethanol from sugarcane molasses as feedstock for power generation using hydrogen as an energy vector.…”
Section: Key Findings and Recommendations For Future Life Cycle Assessment Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exergy analysis is discussed elsewhere for many applications (Sato 2005;Kotas 2012;Moran et al 2018;Dincer and Rosen 2021). The present author has performed exergy assessments in a wide variety of areas: fossil fuel processes (Sadeghi et al 2020;Khoshgoftar Manesh et al 2021), hydrogen production (Lescisin et al 2020Sadeghi et al 2020), electricity generation via fuel cells, gas turbines and Rankine cycles (Hossein Karimi et al 2020), polygeneration (Bolt et al 2021, integrated energy systems (Keshavarzzadeh et al 2020), cooling and district cooling (Anderson et al 2021;Bolt et al 2021), energy storage (Anderson et al 2021), desalination (Keshavarzzadeh et al 2020), solar energy (Keshavarzzadeh et al 2020;Sadeghi et al 2020), bioenergy (Hossein Karimi et al 2020, and countries and their economic sectors (Hossain et al 2020;Rosen 2013).…”
Section: Thermodynamic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Life cycle assessment (LCA) is an effective methodology for analyses (Graedel and Allenby 2010 ). LCA has been applied extensively to a broad range of activities (Ben-Alon et al 2019 ; Lodato et al 2020 ; Lu and Halog 2020 ), including energy processes (Sadeghi et al 2020 ; Mendecka et al 2020 ) and communities (Karunathilake et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Sustainability and Energymentioning
confidence: 99%