2016
DOI: 10.2337/dc16-0718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Effectiveness of Diabetic Oral Medications Among HIV-Infected and HIV-Uninfected Veterans

Abstract: OBJECTIVEType 2 diabetes is increasingly common in HIV-infected individuals. The objective of this study was to compare the glycemic effectiveness of oral diabetic medications among patients with and without HIV infection.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSA longitudinal cohort study was conducted among HIV-infected and uninfected veterans with type 2 diabetes initiating diabetic medications between 1999 and 2010. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) through the year … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Focusing on DM drugs use in our study, it appeared that the treatment regimens were different to those observed in the French general population: 88.6% vs. 43% of patients with DM were on a monotherapy (mostly metformin) in the OVIHD and in the general population, respectively, and only 11.4% of our PLWH with DM were on a combined oral therapy or more recent drugs [ 33 , 46 ]. In a study performed by Han et al in American veterans, 50% of participants received metformin [ 14 ]. Also, some patients were probably controlled on diet alone but we were unable to collect this data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Focusing on DM drugs use in our study, it appeared that the treatment regimens were different to those observed in the French general population: 88.6% vs. 43% of patients with DM were on a monotherapy (mostly metformin) in the OVIHD and in the general population, respectively, and only 11.4% of our PLWH with DM were on a combined oral therapy or more recent drugs [ 33 , 46 ]. In a study performed by Han et al in American veterans, 50% of participants received metformin [ 14 ]. Also, some patients were probably controlled on diet alone but we were unable to collect this data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International guidelines for DM management in PLWH are similar to those in the general population. However, the response to glucose-lowering therapies may be poorer in PLWH as compared to the general population [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When all HbA1c data are used, different periods of time from initiation of a new agent to measurement may lead to bias. As such, observational studies usually assess outcomes based on a single follow‐up HbA1c at a defined point in time, a mean HbA1c over the follow‐up period or the attainment of glycaemic goal at any time during the follow‐up period . Thus, they provide an estimate of glycaemic control after a specific period post an index treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the impact of traditional risk factors on diabetes development does appear to be more pronounced based on studies evaluating benefits of traditional treatment approaches to Type 2 Diabetes that have reported blunted responses in HIV seropositive patients [ 30 , 46 , 47 ]. These differences may also be related to confounding factors among the HIV positive population and require further investigation [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%