2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative effectiveness of team-based care with a clinical decision support system versus team-based care alone on cardiovascular risk reduction among patients with diabetes: Rationale and design of the D4C trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 The other study used community approaches as secondary prevention for reducing worse conditions. 23 The findings indicated that 60.3% of stroke patients who received community-based interventions exhibited a reduction in the severity of their condition. The efficacy ascribed to the emphasis on secondary prevention was evidenced by a study done in Surakarta.…”
Section: Methods Study Designmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…22 The other study used community approaches as secondary prevention for reducing worse conditions. 23 The findings indicated that 60.3% of stroke patients who received community-based interventions exhibited a reduction in the severity of their condition. The efficacy ascribed to the emphasis on secondary prevention was evidenced by a study done in Surakarta.…”
Section: Methods Study Designmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There remains a main issue that the team-based approach is hard to replicate in the community; efforts have been made to develop protocols and guidelines that can facilitate the implementation of interdisciplinary team care of patients with T2DM in community settings. A recently published study design called the Diabetes Complication Control in Community Clinics (D4C) study is a cluster-randomized trial conducted among 38 community health centers in China [ 70 ]. In addition to the members usually included in DM management, such as endocrinologists, cardiologists, and primary care physicians, the study design proposes to add a clinical decision support system that integrates guideline-based treatment algorithms for glycemic, blood pressure, and lipid control, together with a patient’s medical history and insurance policy [ 70 ].…”
Section: The Team-based Approach To Diabetes Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recently published study design called the Diabetes Complication Control in Community Clinics (D4C) study is a cluster-randomized trial conducted among 38 community health centers in China [ 70 ]. In addition to the members usually included in DM management, such as endocrinologists, cardiologists, and primary care physicians, the study design proposes to add a clinical decision support system that integrates guideline-based treatment algorithms for glycemic, blood pressure, and lipid control, together with a patient’s medical history and insurance policy [ 70 ]. Although the results of the D4C trial have not been published yet, it presents a cluster-randomized trial design that provides a roadmap for team-based primary care in community clinics in Asia.…”
Section: The Team-based Approach To Diabetes Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 1 ). Research has shown that strengthening control over risk factors and reducing exposure to risk factors can significantly reduce the incidence of CVD, as well as mortality from it ( 2 4 ). However, even with tight control over traditional risk factors, a considerable proportion of patients remain vulnerable to high risks of cardiovascular events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%