1993
DOI: 10.1016/0049-3848(93)90233-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative effects of enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin in healthy volunteers on prothrombin consumption in whole blood during coagulation, and release of tissue factor pathway inhibitor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20,21,27,28 On the other hand, supratherapeutic doses of heparin were unable to inhibit CFRs in this model. The antithrombotic efficacy of enoxaparin was demonstrated clinically in the recent ESSENCE trial, in which enoxaparin was shown to be superior to heparin in the treatment of unstable angina.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…20,21,27,28 On the other hand, supratherapeutic doses of heparin were unable to inhibit CFRs in this model. The antithrombotic efficacy of enoxaparin was demonstrated clinically in the recent ESSENCE trial, in which enoxaparin was shown to be superior to heparin in the treatment of unstable angina.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In so doing, they enhance the inhibitory effect of AT on activated factor X (FXa), thrombin (FIIa), activated FIX, and activated FXII by several orders of magnitude [1,2]. LMWHs also influence the regulation of the tissue factor (TF) pathway by releasing tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) from the endothelium, and also in part by inhibiting the generation and activity of FVIIa in an ATdependent manner [3][4][5]. The advantages of LMWHs over unfractionated heparin (UFH) are mainly because of their predictable pharmacokinetics and excellent bioavailability after s.c. administration [6], their longer half-life [7], and the lack of a need for laboratory monitoring in the large majority of patients treated [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16) Evidence suggests that, in addition to the anti Xa and anti IIa activities, heparin and LMWHs may exert their antithrombotic effects by stimulating the release of an endogenous tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI). 5,[18][19][20] One may speculate that LMWHs may also release TFPI more efficiently than UFH owing to their higher bioavailability. Another potential mechanism by which LMWHs may exert their antithrombotic effect is through inhibition of the interaction of von Willebrand factor (vWF) with platelets resulting in reduced vWF dependent platelet adhesion and aggregation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%