1986
DOI: 10.1002/nau.1930050609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative effects of five different calcium channel blockers on the atropine‐resistant contraction in electrically stimulated rabbit urinary bladder

Abstract: The effects of the calcium channel blockers nifedipine, verapamil, diltiazem, flunarizine, and lidoflazin on electrically induced contractions of isolated rabbit detrusor were compared in the absence and presence of muscarinic receptor blockade with scopolamine. All drugs had a depressant effect on the contractions both before and after scopolamine addition, nifedipine being the most potent of the calcium channel blockers. However, only nifedipine showed a significant preference for the nonmuscarinic part of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 22] showed in the rat bladder that decreasing the calcium influx with a calcium‐channel blocker was more effective in inhibiting the atropine‐resistant component of the contraction induced by electrical‐field stimulation than was α,β‐methylene ATP. Again, the bladder instability seen in obstructed rats seems to be particularly related to the atropine‐resistant contraction component [ 23, 24] that is highly sensitive to calcium antagonists [ 25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 22] showed in the rat bladder that decreasing the calcium influx with a calcium‐channel blocker was more effective in inhibiting the atropine‐resistant component of the contraction induced by electrical‐field stimulation than was α,β‐methylene ATP. Again, the bladder instability seen in obstructed rats seems to be particularly related to the atropine‐resistant contraction component [ 23, 24] that is highly sensitive to calcium antagonists [ 25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available information does not suggest that systemic therapy with calcium antagonists is an effective way to treat detrusor overactivity, but controlled clinical trials are lacking. However, the possibility that intravesical therapy with these drugs could be useful should not be ignored, nor the fact that calcium antagonists may enhance the effects of antimuscarinic agents (Andersson et al 1986). Oral nifedipine has been used effectively as prophylaxis for autonomic hyperreflexia during urologic instrumentation in spinal cord injured patients (Wein 2001b).…”
Section: Drugs Acting On Membrane Channels A) Calcium Antagonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49 There is a pOSSibility that intravesical therapy with calcium antagonists may be useful, and calcium antagonists may enhance the effects ofantimuscarinic agents. 50 Some drugs used to treat overactive bladder have been shown to have more than one mechanism of action. They all have a more or less pronounced antimuscarinic effect and, in addition, an often poorly defined "direct" action on bladder muscle.…”
Section: Ion Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%