2013
DOI: 10.12968/ijtr.2013.20.10.501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative efficacy of cervical retraction exercises (McKenzie) with and without using pressure biofeedback in cervical spondylosis

Abstract: Aim: To compare the effectiveness of cervical retraction exercises (McKenzie) with or without using pressure biofeedback in reducing pain and disability among patients with cervical spondylosis. Methods: Thirty participants of both genders and aged between 30 and 70 years who were medically diagnosed with cervical spondylosis were included and allocated by randomised sampling into two study groups. Group A were given cervical retraction exercises and Group B were given cervical retraction exercises and instruc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals with current neck pain or disability may not generate comparably reliable or valid measurements. Moreover, while the MDC provides some indication of the responsiveness of neck retraction force measurements, we do not know what would constitute a meaningful change in neck retraction strength for patients with neck retraction weakness for whom a component of the intervention is neck retraction strengthening [47,48]. Investigation of these issues is warranted.…”
Section: Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Individuals with current neck pain or disability may not generate comparably reliable or valid measurements. Moreover, while the MDC provides some indication of the responsiveness of neck retraction force measurements, we do not know what would constitute a meaningful change in neck retraction strength for patients with neck retraction weakness for whom a component of the intervention is neck retraction strengthening [47,48]. Investigation of these issues is warranted.…”
Section: Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The cervical spine provides musculoskeletal stability and support for the cranium, as well as a flexible, protective column for movement, balance adaptation, and housing of the spinal cord and vertebral artery. [ 44 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%