2022
DOI: 10.3390/d14040272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Free Web Tools ImageJ and Photopea for the Surface Area Quantification of Planar Substrates and Organisms

Abstract: Biological imaging is an essential tool to visualise and obtain reference data. In this context, the programme ImageJ has been widely used in many disciplines to determine the surface areas of planar biological samples in marine and aquatic experimental biology. Despite its range of advantages, ImageJ is relatively time-consuming, because of the need to manually select the target areas for quantification. Hence, we here evaluated the freeware programme Photopea as a potential alternative by comparing the accur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surface area was calculated in ImageJ (Schneider et al, 2012 ) by using cylindrical surface area (SA = 2πrh + 2πr 2 ) as a proxy for individual branches within a ramet. It has been previously demonstrated that software such as ImageJ can be used for accurate surface area measurements on organisms with complex and irregular shapes, by breaking down parts into geometric figures for analysis (El‐Khaled et al, 2022 ; McLachlan et al, 2022 ; McLachlan & Grottoli, 2021 ). We further evaluated this metric by comparing ImageJ surface area values versus wax dipping (Veal et al, 2010 ), in an independent set of 50 A. hyacinthus coral fragments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface area was calculated in ImageJ (Schneider et al, 2012 ) by using cylindrical surface area (SA = 2πrh + 2πr 2 ) as a proxy for individual branches within a ramet. It has been previously demonstrated that software such as ImageJ can be used for accurate surface area measurements on organisms with complex and irregular shapes, by breaking down parts into geometric figures for analysis (El‐Khaled et al, 2022 ; McLachlan et al, 2022 ; McLachlan & Grottoli, 2021 ). We further evaluated this metric by comparing ImageJ surface area values versus wax dipping (Veal et al, 2010 ), in an independent set of 50 A. hyacinthus coral fragments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of the final object shrinkage on the slice button mushroom is determined based on the surface area. Surface area analysis using ImageJ 1.8.0-172 software [14,15]. The final large percentage of dried mushroom slices can be determined by the following equation ( 3), where Sa is the final object shrinkage and h t-i is the t-th and 0-th data (initial).…”
Section: Surface Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies of coral reefs have implemented manual tracing of coral colonies to estimate their areal footprint as a 2D surface, which is used as a proxy for colony size [22][23][24][25]43]. By approximating the 3D surface areas of corals, we captured a loss rate of live coral that was significantly greater than that estimated by 2D planar area (Figure 7).…”
Section: Quantification Of the Coral Bleaching Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, efficiently extracting biological metrics, such as cover of benthic organisms (e.g., coral or algae), can be more complicated and time-consuming [6]. A widely implemented approach is image segmentation-the scaled measurement and annotation of objects within an image [22][23][24][25]. This form of image analysis is generally used to estimate metrics, including percentage cover of benthic flora and fauna, via the 2D areal footprint of organisms in a given area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%