2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Platelet-rich Fibrin and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate as Pulpotomy Agents in Permanent Teeth with Incomplete Root Development: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Certain studies also indicated that PRF increases HDPC proliferation and differentiation (5,11), which is consistent with the results of the present study. PRF has been applied in vital pulp therapy in a preclinical trial (12) and a case report (13), where good outcomes were suggested. The application of CGF in vital pulp therapy is rare and the effect of CGF on HDPC has remained to be determined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain studies also indicated that PRF increases HDPC proliferation and differentiation (5,11), which is consistent with the results of the present study. PRF has been applied in vital pulp therapy in a preclinical trial (12) and a case report (13), where good outcomes were suggested. The application of CGF in vital pulp therapy is rare and the effect of CGF on HDPC has remained to be determined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors recommended platelet‐rich fibrin as a more economic method for pulp capping (Keswani et al . , Kumar et al . ).…”
Section: Vital Pulp Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The five included studies were published between 2006 and 2018, two of which were conducted in India [16, 19], one in Iran [15], one in Turkey [18] and one in Egypt [17]. Of the five studies, four were parallel trials and the remaining study was a split-mouth trial.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the five studies, four were parallel trials and the remaining study was a split-mouth trial. Of the included studies, two compared MTA with CH [17, 18], one compared CEM with MTA [15], one compared PRF with MTA [16], and one compared MTA, TAP and abscess remedy [19]. Four studies with 232 teeth used each tooth as a unit of analysis [1619], while the other one with 118 roots used each root as a unit [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%