2012
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/16/5295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of support vector machine classification for computer aided detection of breast masses in mammography

Abstract: False positive (FP) marks represent an obstacle for effective use of computer-aided detection (CADe) of breast masses in mammography. Typically, the problem can be approached either by developing more discriminative features or by employing different classifier designs. In this paper, the usage of support vector machine (SVM) classification for FP reduction in CADe is investigated, presenting a systematic quantitative evaluation against neural networks, k-nearest neighbor classification, linear discriminant an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several studies described an appropriate reference standard that included histopathology with either clinical follow-up or cancer registry matching to ascertain outcomes [9,14,16,18,21,28,31]. Studies proposed to develop and/or evaluate AI models or techniques for breast cancer detection [9,11,18,21,22,27,28,26], or for diagnosis (classification) or interpretation of mammographic examinations [13,14,15,16,20,[23][24][25]30], or dealt with advancing computer-aided detection (CAD) systems through new AI models [10,12,17,19,29]; and one study investigated AI for discrimination between benign and cancerous lesions jointly with cancer risk prediction [31]. Rodriguez-Ruiz et al [9] reported a multi-reader study comparing an AI system with radiologists' interpretation of various datasets of screening and clinical mammographic examinations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several studies described an appropriate reference standard that included histopathology with either clinical follow-up or cancer registry matching to ascertain outcomes [9,14,16,18,21,28,31]. Studies proposed to develop and/or evaluate AI models or techniques for breast cancer detection [9,11,18,21,22,27,28,26], or for diagnosis (classification) or interpretation of mammographic examinations [13,14,15,16,20,[23][24][25]30], or dealt with advancing computer-aided detection (CAD) systems through new AI models [10,12,17,19,29]; and one study investigated AI for discrimination between benign and cancerous lesions jointly with cancer risk prediction [31]. Rodriguez-Ruiz et al [9] reported a multi-reader study comparing an AI system with radiologists' interpretation of various datasets of screening and clinical mammographic examinations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is used in various fields and in a wide range of different applications including text classification, sound recognition, image categorisation, and data classification [31]. SVM is popular for its high-dimensional features implementation while providing high detection accuracy compared to other classification algorithms such as neural networks and random forests [32]. This benefits fault classification by reducing confusion.…”
Section: Classification Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seeks to locate an optimum plane that separates two groups of data. This algorithm is used extensively because of its ability to deal with large features whilst having high detection accuracy when compared to other classification algorithms such as Neural Networks (NN) and Random Forests [25]. A potential issue with the original SVM is that it was designed for binary classification.…”
Section: Classification Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%