1997
DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/43.3.511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of three assay systems for automated determination of hemoglobin A1c

Abstract: We evaluated three newly introduced systems for automated determinations of hemoglobin (Hb) A1c, which allow the processing of large amounts of samples in a routine clinical laboratory. We compared these methods—the Variant HPLC, the Hi-Auto A1c analyzer system, and the Roche immunoassay—with the Diamat HPLC system. All showed good precision and good concordance with the Diamat HPLC. The reference range for Hb A1c has to be determined by the laboratory for each assay system. Interference study showed no statis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Each measured HbA 1c result was DCCT adjusted to take different measurement methods and reference ranges into account: HbA 1c divided by actual mean normal and multiplied by the mean normal HbA 1c of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial percentage (i. e., 5.05 %, 32 mmol/mol). HbA 1c was measured with high-performance liquid chromatography from BioRad ® (BioRad ® Variant Hemoglobin Analyzer, coefficient of variation: < 4 % [20]) from 1992 up to 2004 and subsequently with another HPLC method (TOSOH G8 UIN 20305, coefficient of variation: < 2 % [21]). With every change of method or devices a new reference range was established with measurements from blood samples from at least 100 healthy persons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each measured HbA 1c result was DCCT adjusted to take different measurement methods and reference ranges into account: HbA 1c divided by actual mean normal and multiplied by the mean normal HbA 1c of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial percentage (i. e., 5.05 %, 32 mmol/mol). HbA 1c was measured with high-performance liquid chromatography from BioRad ® (BioRad ® Variant Hemoglobin Analyzer, coefficient of variation: < 4 % [20]) from 1992 up to 2004 and subsequently with another HPLC method (TOSOH G8 UIN 20305, coefficient of variation: < 2 % [21]). With every change of method or devices a new reference range was established with measurements from blood samples from at least 100 healthy persons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This development is presumably a consequence of the reduction of the applied methods. In the last 20 years 5 methods [3,5,6] are mainly used: high performance liquid chromatography, immunologically based methods, affinity chromatography, capillary electrophoresis and enzymatic methods. It seems that unreliable methods are no longer applied.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were collected between 1992-01-01 and 2014-02-01. The HbA 1c was measured with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) from BioRad ® (BioRad ® Variant HemoglobinAnalyzer, coefficient of variation: < 4 % [24]) from 1992 up to 2004 as well as with another HPLC method (TOSOH G8 UIN 20305, coefficient of variation: < 2 % [25]) between 2005 and 2014. In order to record the exact medication intake, we used: 1) prescription plans of primary care physicians; 2) prescription plans obtained from inpatient stay (if any); 3) prescription plans of our own clinic; 4) self-medication reported by patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%