2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsase.2018.11.005
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of vertical accuracy of elevated points with ground control points from ASTERDEM and SRTMDEM with respect to CARTOSAT-1DEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional data collection methods such as mapping and ground surveying are time-consuming and costly 2 . Additionally, the information is not updated frequently and is difficult to access 3,4 . A powerful implementation of economic activity monitoring research is remotely-sensed image, which provide an up-to-date and realistic presentation of the Earth's surface.…”
Section: Analysis Of Regional Economic Development Based On Land Use mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional data collection methods such as mapping and ground surveying are time-consuming and costly 2 . Additionally, the information is not updated frequently and is difficult to access 3,4 . A powerful implementation of economic activity monitoring research is remotely-sensed image, which provide an up-to-date and realistic presentation of the Earth's surface.…”
Section: Analysis Of Regional Economic Development Based On Land Use mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we did not discuss the absolute geo coordinate accuracy by using GCPs, the corrected DEM would still inevitably contain errors. A true error assessment can typically be conducted with enough GCPs [9,10,15,38,52], which provides an actual error estimation. However, the error estimation using GCP in an insecure place, located in a remote area with high mountain and poor traffic accessibility, makes it nearly impossible to collect such data.…”
Section: Advantages and Shortcoming Of The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also evaluated the model performance in decreasing the locational errors using the quantitative value of the root means square error (RMSE) to confirm the degree of the matching in both corrected and uncorrected data in the unaffected area (Figures 13c and 14c). This indicator has been frequently used to evaluate the prediction error quantitatively [38]. The RMSE of the corrected profile cross-section was obtained at 0.81 m, whereas the RMSE for the uncorrected profile cross-section was obtained at 3.81 m, which is more than four times larger than that of the corrected one.…”
Section: Comparison Of Cross-sections Of Dems In the Affected And Unamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where X i is the elevation of a DEM at point i, Y i is the reference elevation at point i, and n is the number of samples. According to Rawat et al (2019), RMSE varies with the variability within the distribution of error magnitudes, square root of the number of errors and the magnitude of MAE. MAE is a more natural measure of average error and, unlike RMSE, is unambiguous (Rawat et al, 2019).…”
Section: Vertical Accuracy Of the Demsmentioning
confidence: 99%