2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2001.00278.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative fecundity and survival rates of Phlebotomus papatasi sandflies membrane fed on blood from eight mammal species

Abstract: Female sandflies, Phlebotomus papatasi (Scopoli) (Diptera: Psychodidae), were fed via chicken membrane on heparinized blood from eight species of mammal (human, horse, cow, pig, dog, rabbit, guinea-pig, hamster) and their reproductive success rates were compared. No appreciable differences between those fed on human and animal blood were detected with respect to the proportion of flies that fed successfully, mortality-rate within 24h, number of eggs laid per blood-fed female or egg viability. When mass-rearing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Harre et al [31] compared fecundity and survival rates among sand flies ( P. papatasi ) membrane fed on blood from eight species (including man) but found no significant differences between any of them. However, Noguera et al [32] studying the reproductive potential of Lu.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harre et al [31] compared fecundity and survival rates among sand flies ( P. papatasi ) membrane fed on blood from eight species (including man) but found no significant differences between any of them. However, Noguera et al [32] studying the reproductive potential of Lu.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large caloric reserves could provide greater potential energy for egg production, oviposition, survival, and flight capacity (Magna-relli & Modi 1988;Harre et al, 2001).…”
Section: Caloric Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although natural membranes can also be applied, there are artificial options to replace the use of animal skin [2]. The large number of different feeders available for mosquito species is notable and the availability of artificial systems for arachnids, phlebotomines and triatomines is also considerable [8,12,13,19,21].…”
Section: Artificial Feedersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a crucial point to be addressed since the argument here is to promote an ethical conscience based on 3Rs principle to increase the artificial feeder application in substitution for live animal use to blood-feed invertebrate vectors. In fact, although some articles reported negative effects on fecundity caused by artificial blood-feeding for Rhodnius prolixus and Simulium damnosum [22,23], there are many works showing positive examples in which colonies maintained by artificial feeders are comparable to live animal-fed counterparts for different species [9,11,16,18,21,[24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%