Comparative Geographic Structures of Two Parasitoid‐host Interactions

Abstract

Abstract.-Recent studies of parasitoid-host interactions have demonstrated that parasitoids and their hosts are geographically structured for traits such as virulence and encapsulation defenses, but no studies have yet compared the geographic structure of parasitoids and hosts using neutral genetic markers. Such studies of geographic structure are needed to evaluate the underlying geographic scale at which these interactions evolve and allow assessment of the relative effects of selection and gene flow on the geographic structure observed in traits under selection. We used sequence data from the mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase I and II subunits to document and compare the geographic structures of the parasitoid Agathis thompsoni and its moth host Greya subalba. We also documented the geographic structure of G. enchrysa and compared it to the geographic structure of its parasitoid Agathis n. sp. The results demonstrated that parasitoids and their hosts may have incongruent patterns of geographic structure as assessed by molecular markers. As a consequence, the geographic scale at which the interaction evolves may be different for each species involved in the interaction. Depending on the interplay of selection and gene flow, there may not be a one-to-one correspondence of traits important in the interaction between parasitoids and their hosts at the level of local populations. The geographic structures of A. thompsoni and G. subalba and Agathis n. sp. and G. enchrysa provide further evidence of the potential importance of the formation of geographic mosaics in coevolving parasitoid-host interactions and evolving interactions in general.

Spatial Genetic Structure of a Symbiotic Beetle-Fungal System: Toward Multi-Taxa Integrated Landscape Genetics

“…Previous work has investigated the phylogenetic history of this beetle-fungal symbiosis [12] but no studies have yet examined or compared the contemporary population genetic structure in these two species. Otherstudies have compared the contemporary genetic structure of interacting species including termites and symbiotic fungi [13], ants and their cultivated fungi [14], and other host-parasitoid interactions [15]. However, few of these studies have compared contemporary genetic variation of symbionts in a spatially explicit context, although the importance of spatial heterogenetiy to species interactions and coevolution is well accepted [15], [16].…”

Phylogeography and the geographic cline in the armament of a seed‐predatory weevil: effects of historical events vs. natural selection from the host plant

“…Overall, these phylogeographical data suggest that historical vicariance, limitation of gene flow, and random genetic drift following bottleneck events, can affect the geographical variation in the traits of interacting species. Although such a phenomena has been described in other predator–prey or host–parasite systems (Dybdahl & Lively 1996; Stanton & Galen 1997; Kaltz & Shykoff 1998; Althoff & Thompson 1999; Kaltz et al . 1999; Brodie et al .…”

Population structure of a large blue butterfly and its specialist parasitoid in a fragmented landscape

“…1995). Despite this variability, parasites have often been found to have more strongly structured populations (Althoff & Thompson 1999; McCoy et al . 2005), which appears to be compatible with our findings.…”