2011
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jir596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Immunogenicity and Cross-Clade Protective Efficacy of Mammalian Cell-Grown Inactivated and Live Attenuated H5N1 Reassortant Vaccines in Ferrets

Abstract: Continued H5N1 virus infection in humans highlights the need for vaccine strategies that provide cross-clade protection against this rapidly evolving virus. We report a comparative evaluation in ferrets of the immunogenicity and cross-protective efficacy of isogenic mammalian cell-grown, live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) and adjuvanted, whole-virus, inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV), produced from a clade 1 H5N1 6:2 reassortant vaccine candidate (caVN1203-Len17rg) based on the cold-adapted A/Leningrad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in IgA and IgG antibodies between the immunization groups were not evident using the standard HI assay. These results are consistent with the ability of a live attenuated influenza vaccine to elicit higher levels of nasal wash IgA and greater reduction of virus shedding than an inactivated influenza virus vaccine (20,25). Although the precise immunological mechanism(s) involved in viral clearance was not addressed in the current study, it is reasonable to speculate that raised antibody levels in the ferret respiratory tract of virus-infected ferrets would have a greater capacity to neutralize virus infectivity and blunt transmission.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences in IgA and IgG antibodies between the immunization groups were not evident using the standard HI assay. These results are consistent with the ability of a live attenuated influenza vaccine to elicit higher levels of nasal wash IgA and greater reduction of virus shedding than an inactivated influenza virus vaccine (20,25). Although the precise immunological mechanism(s) involved in viral clearance was not addressed in the current study, it is reasonable to speculate that raised antibody levels in the ferret respiratory tract of virus-infected ferrets would have a greater capacity to neutralize virus infectivity and blunt transmission.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Ferret IgG and IgA antibodies were detected using a modified ELISA procedure as previously described (20,25). Flat-bottom 96-well microtiter plates (Immulon II; Dynatech Laboratories, Chantilly, VA) were coated with 100 HAU per well of purified Perth/09 inactivated virus overnight at 4°C.…”
Section: Virusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, these data and previous studies (53) indicate that pandemic 6:2 reassortant vaccine virus based on caLen17 MDV generated through the established reverse genetics system provides candidate vaccine viruses with preclinical safety and immunogenicity profiles consistent with successful development of human vaccines for H5N1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Vaccinated mice remained healthy and showed no evidence of weight loss. Cross-clade protective immunity induced by caVN-Len17rg vaccine virus was previously evaluated in a ferret model (53) and compared to inactivated vaccines. Both vaccines were highly immunogenic and protective against homologous challenge following double immunization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While young adult ferrets (generally 4 to 12 months old) are most frequently used, the age of animals employed can vary depending on the questions addressed in the study, ranging from ferrets that are newly weaned (Յ8 weeks old) to aged ferrets (Ͼ4 years of age) (11,12). The choice of anesthetic used for inoculation and sampling postinoculation (typically ketamine cocktails of various compositions and dosages administered intramuscularly, inhaled isoflurane, or both) can vary between laboratories, leading to differences in the depth of sedation and the respiration rates of sedated animals (13)(14)(15)(16).…”
Section: Standardization Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%