2002
DOI: 10.1002/igs.10048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative in vitro study of contact- and image-based rigid registration for computer-aided surgery

Abstract: We present an in -vitro study of rigid registration methods for computer -aided surgery. The goal of the study is t o empirically obtain accuracy measures under optimal laboratory conditions and to identify the weak links in the registration chain. Specifically, we investigate two common registration methods: contact -based registration and image -based landmark registra tion. We establish a framework for comparing the accuracy of both methods and describe phantoms, protocols, and algorithms for tool tip calib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No specific image-data acquisition with markers for registration is necessary. The accuracy of this method is limited because superficial landmarks are not definite or reliable due to possible skin shift or swelling, and distinct marks on the bone are not always available at the site of surgery and require invasive registration 2,5,19,22,34,44,49,52,57,61,67,70,78,93,107,121,128,131,135,137,143,145,147,154,168,176,179,193,195,196 . Use of this method is described for image-guided surgery of the lateral skull base 19 , spine 78 and spinal chord 94 .…”
Section: Markerless Pair-point Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No specific image-data acquisition with markers for registration is necessary. The accuracy of this method is limited because superficial landmarks are not definite or reliable due to possible skin shift or swelling, and distinct marks on the bone are not always available at the site of surgery and require invasive registration 2,5,19,22,34,44,49,52,57,61,67,70,78,93,107,121,128,131,135,137,143,145,147,154,168,176,179,193,195,196 . Use of this method is described for image-guided surgery of the lateral skull base 19 , spine 78 and spinal chord 94 .…”
Section: Markerless Pair-point Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found a mean deviation of 2.75 mm for image-based, noninvasive registration and a mean deviation of 0.5 mm for contact-based, invasive registration. 14 To perform a registration process with an acceptable accuracy, not only the technical components, but also the technique of registration must be optimized. Sugano and colleagues stated that the location of the surfacematching area will influence accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary to register interprocedural images to preprocedural plans, and to determine the relative positions of surgical instruments and anatomical structures. 1 Registration accuracy therefore substantially influences the accuracy of image-guided procedures. 1,2 In addition, the accuracy with which a pre-operative plan can be executed is directly related to registration accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%