1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9236(98)90139-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative kinetics and dynamics of zaleplon, zolpidem, and placebo*

Abstract: Benzodiazepine agonist effects of zaleplon and zolpidem were dose and concentration dependent. At the usual clinically effective hypnotic dose (10 mg of either drug), agonist effects of zolpidem exceeded those of zaleplon.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
98
4
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
15
98
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus morning testing occurred 9.5 h after zolpidem-ER dosing and 5.5 h after zaleplon dosing which is approximately 1.5 h after drug should have been eliminated based on pharmacokinetic data. 23,24 Both time intervals are consistent with prior studies of SDMC involving overnight sleep. 5,6 Polysomnography (PSG) was conducted at each of the 3 overnight visits with bedtime at the subject's reported typical bedtime and time in bed held constant at 8 hours.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Proceduressupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus morning testing occurred 9.5 h after zolpidem-ER dosing and 5.5 h after zaleplon dosing which is approximately 1.5 h after drug should have been eliminated based on pharmacokinetic data. 23,24 Both time intervals are consistent with prior studies of SDMC involving overnight sleep. 5,6 Polysomnography (PSG) was conducted at each of the 3 overnight visits with bedtime at the subject's reported typical bedtime and time in bed held constant at 8 hours.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Proceduressupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The two hypnotics have similar mechanisms of action, both binding preferentially to the α-1 benzodiazepine receptor subunit, 22 although their durations of action differ. Zolpidem-ER has an estimated duration of action of 6-8 h, with a t 1/2 of 2.8 h and a t max of 1.5 h. 23 In contrast, zaleplon has an estimated duration of action of 3-4 h due to rapid absorption and elimination, with t 1/2 and t max both approximately one h. 24 These doses were chosen because, at the time of study, they were the recommended therapeutic doses for treatment of insomnia. In addition, residual morning sedation has not been detected with either drug at these doses when administered at bedtime, 25,26 or with zaleplon 10 mg when administered as little as 4 h before wake time (middle-of-the-night dosing).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary experiments had determined 30 min to be an optimal incubation time for formation of both metabolites. Clinical concentrations for zaleplon are in the low micromolar range (Greenblatt et al, 1998); however, it was determined from this study that a 20 M zaleplon incubation concentration was necessary to produce both metabolites in a readily measurable amount. Zaleplon concentrations greater than 50 M did not result in a corresponding increase in either metabolite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The advantages of these newer agents over benzodiazepines seem to result from their mode of interaction with the GABA A receptor combined with a reduced duration of action. Thus, for example, zolpidem has a moderate affinity for ␣1-containing GABA A receptors in radioligand binding experiments (10 -100 nM; Arbilla et al, 1985;Smith et al, 2001;Sullivan et al, 2004), is fully efficacious (Smith et al, 2001;Sullivan et al, 2004), has selectivity for GABA A receptors containing the ␣1 subunit (Damgen and Luddens, 1999;Smith et al, 2001), produces sedative activity in animals that is mediated through ␣1 subunit-containing GABA A receptors , and has a half-life in rodents and humans after oral administration of 2 to 3 h (Gaudreault et al, 1995;Greenblatt et al, 1998). Zopiclone displays a similar efficacy profile in animal tests (Perrault et al, 1990), but it has only marginal selectivity for GABA A receptors containing the ␣1 subunit (Damgen and Luddens, 1999;Smith et al, 2001) and its half-life in humans of 3.5 to 6.5 h (Fernandez et al, 1995) has been associated with next day hangover effects, including impaired driving ability (Bocca et al, 1999;Vermeeren et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%