2016
DOI: 10.18178/jocet.2016.4.6.333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Life-Cycle Analysis of Insulation Materials in A Dwelling, Addressing Alternative Heating Systems and Life Spans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies are reported in the literature for building envelope materials and parameters to reduce operation energy. Among these studies, changing the different parameters of the building envelope in a reference building and finding the scenario with the most energy efficient combinations are a topic of great importance [7][8][9][10]. For example, Mirrahimi et al [11] showed that building envelope parameters (window/wall ratio, wall type, building orientation, glazing, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies are reported in the literature for building envelope materials and parameters to reduce operation energy. Among these studies, changing the different parameters of the building envelope in a reference building and finding the scenario with the most energy efficient combinations are a topic of great importance [7][8][9][10]. For example, Mirrahimi et al [11] showed that building envelope parameters (window/wall ratio, wall type, building orientation, glazing, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In TIM LCA the functional unit (FU) is the amount of the material required to present thermal resistance of 1 m 2 K/W from a surface area of 1 m 2 of the TIM, but in Window LCA, the FU is the triple glazed window. The Life Cycle Inventory was based on the Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) and literature data for several European countries, while the environmental impacts were calculated according to CML 2001 and CED methods (Teenou, 2012;Saadatian, 2014). Tables 2 and 3 present the economic and environmental data for the examined materials.…”
Section: Building Economic and Environmentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the reported embodied energy of XPS was slightly higher than EPS, its GHG emissions were more than 20 times higher compared to the data reported by Franklin Associates (2017). Since XPS and EPS have the same resin (polystyrene), many studies compared their LCA and, likewise, reported a much higher GHG emissions from XPS (Silvestre et al, 2011, Pargana et al, 2014, Nicolae & George-Vlad, 2015, Biswas et al, 2016, Saadatian et al, 2016, Llantoy et al, 2020, Monteiro et al, 2020. Specifically, Biswas et al (2016) compared the Cradle-to-Grave GWP of EPS and XPS with different blowing agents (HFC-134a, HFC-152a, CO2), and found that the significant fugitive emissions of high-GWP blowing agents was the major contributor of GHG emissions.…”
Section: A23 Extruded Polystyrenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that EPS and PUR had low contribution to all impact categories and low embodied energy, while XPS presented high global warming potential (GWP) and photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP). Many other studies (Silvestre et al, 2011, Nicolae & George-Vlad, 2015, Saadatian et al, 2016, Llantoy et al, 2020, Monteiro et al, 2020 assessed both embodied and operational energy of these three materials with the same thermal resistance for various applications or under multiple scenarios, and presented very different results on the environmental performance of PUR compared to EPS and XPS. For example, researchers took the impact of insulation thickness, ventilation level, exterior wall alternatives (double brick, concrete and wood walls) and building occupancy patterns into consideration, and assessed the trade-offs between embodied and operational impacts for some insulation materials including PUR, EPS and XPS (Monteiro et al, 2020).…”
Section: System Boundary and Manufacturing Processmentioning
confidence: 99%