Comparative Literature, World Literature and Ethical Literary Criticism. Literature’s “Infra-Other”

Abstract

Relying on some of the ideas of Yuri M. Lotman on “semiosphere”, the dynamics and dialogue between “centres” and “peripheries”, as well as on my own ideas on cultural symbiosis expounded in my essay books A Call for Cultural Symbiosis. Meditations from U (Toronto, 2005) and Kümme kirja Montaigne’ile. “Ise ja “teine” (Ten Letters to Montaigne. ‘Self ” and ‘Other’, in Estonian: Tartu, 2014; in English, 2018) and inspired by the recent foundation in China of the International Association for Ethical Literary Criticism, I will try to meditate on the interrelation of Comparative Literature, World Literature and Ethical Literary Criticism both in theory and in the practice of teaching and researching literature at universities and high schools. The main purpose is to look at the ways how a “self”-centred practice of literary research and teaching (formalistic as well as sociological approaches, restricting World Literature to the Western mainstream, or just dealing with one’s own national literature, avoiding its comparative contextualization) could be gradually replaced by a symbioticdialogical treatment of literature, capable of providing our activity with a firm and solid ethical dimension, something that would definitely strengthen the position of humanities in the world academia.

Literary Creativity and Transgeniality

“…(The original Estonian poem appeared in print for the first time in 1953, that is, forty years after the poet's passing away.) It complements my discussion about creative parallels between Liiv and Jidi Majia in a recently published article, see Talvet 2018. In this powerful vision of Nature, which is itself subject to cosmic rhythms, the poetic image is transmitted in the traditional Finno-Ugric verse pattern (not really typical of Liiv).…”