2017
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2017.2685502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Measurements of ITER Nb3Sn Strands Between Two Laboratories

Abstract: ITER Nb3Sn strand quality verification tests require large quantities of precise measurements. Therefore regular cross-checking between testing laboratories is critically important. In this paper, we present results from a cross-checking test of 140 samples between the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, USA and the University of Twente, the Netherlands. The tests comprise measurements at 4.2 K on critical current, RRR and hysteresis loss, while at room temperature the chromium layer thickness, Cu/nonCu r… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figures 3(a) and (b) show 12 T I c versus heat treatment temperatures for the JASTEC and KAT samples respectively. Evidently I c is not sensitive to heat treatment temperature or time within the experimental uncertainty which can be up to 5% of I c [25]. When the heat treatment time in step two is reduced to 20 h or less, however, I c of the JASTEC strand reduces significantly as shown in figure 4(a) where data can be fitted (solid line) using an exponential function…”
Section: Critical Current and Hysteresis Lossesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Figures 3(a) and (b) show 12 T I c versus heat treatment temperatures for the JASTEC and KAT samples respectively. Evidently I c is not sensitive to heat treatment temperature or time within the experimental uncertainty which can be up to 5% of I c [25]. When the heat treatment time in step two is reduced to 20 h or less, however, I c of the JASTEC strand reduces significantly as shown in figure 4(a) where data can be fitted (solid line) using an exponential function…”
Section: Critical Current and Hysteresis Lossesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Straight wires approximately 25 cm long were inserted into 1 mm interior diameter quartz tubes to create RRR samples. The ends of the Nb 3 Sn wire for both the I c and RRR samples were welded shut using a spot welder to prevent tin leak during the heat treatment [3], [4]. Groups of samples were wrapped in stainless steel foil before being placed in the center of the furnaces.…”
Section: A Heat Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set up used for RRR measurements was the same as previously reported [3], [4]. Unlike for the ITER project, which defined RRR as the ratio of resistances at 273 K and 20 K, the LARP specification called for the use of the IEC standard [5], which is defined as the ratio of resistance at room temperature (295 K) to that determined by the intersection of two straight lines extrapolated from the resistance versus temperature curve, as shown on Fig.…”
Section: ) Residual Resistance Ratio (Rrr)mentioning
confidence: 99%