2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00104-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative measurements of microbial activity in drinking water biofilters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we aimed at assessing the minimum INT concentration at which the reaction became saturated, thus minimizing potential toxicity in microbial plankton samples. Most published in vivo INT assays use concentrations ranging from 0.2 to 1 mM (Kim et al 1994;Posch et al 1997;Fonseca et al 2001;Hatzinger et al 2003). However, as far as we know, the optimal INT concentration had never been tested for microbial plankton communities.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we aimed at assessing the minimum INT concentration at which the reaction became saturated, thus minimizing potential toxicity in microbial plankton samples. Most published in vivo INT assays use concentrations ranging from 0.2 to 1 mM (Kim et al 1994;Posch et al 1997;Fonseca et al 2001;Hatzinger et al 2003). However, as far as we know, the optimal INT concentration had never been tested for microbial plankton communities.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They represent a large and diverse pool of species and exhibit a vast array of metabolic functions. Some of them are key players in biogeochemical processes (Cotner and Biddanda 2002;Falkowski et al 2008), participate in controlling water quality (Fonseca et al 2001;Yu et al 2009) and are responsible for the degradation of organic pollutants released in the environment (Männistö et al 2001;Chinalia and Killham 2006;Slater et al 2008). In the current context of global change, detailed knowledge about the microbial diversity, specific functions and ecology of micro-organisms that inhabit water columns, sediments and microbial biomats is needed (Duffy and Stachowicz 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ETS is measured by saturating the mitochondrial and the microsomal ETS with their natural substrates, NADH and succinate, for the mitochondrial ETS, and NADPH, for the microsomal ETS (Borgmann, 1977) and then detecting the resulting electron flux along the ETS via the electron acceptor, INT (2-p-iodophenyl-3-p-nitrophenyl-5-phenyl-tetrazolium chloride). Of the many tetrazolium salts, the ETS assay here employs INT because of its sensitivity to dehydrogenase activity (Fonseca et al, 2001). ETS activity is calculated in moles of electrons (μmol e −1 h −1 DM −1 ), but then converted stoichiometrically into volumetric oxygen units (μlO 2 h −1 DM −1 ) and reported as potential respiration.…”
Section: Ets Activity and Potential Respirationmentioning
confidence: 99%