Comparative overview of the preliminary proceedings in the Republic of Serbia, Germany, and Italy

Bošković, Aleksandar; Radović, Nenad

doi:10.1016/j.ijlcj.2017.09.001

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Following Tyler's (1990) work, a number of empirical studies emerged on the correlates and consequences of legitimacy perceptions across a variety of contexts. Most studies report findings in support of Tyler's two key findings: first, procedural justice (i.e., judgments about the fairness of the processes by which people are treated) is a strong correlate of legitimacy; and second, legitimacy enhances the likelihood of legal compliance and of people's willingness to cooperate with criminal justice authorities (Murphy & Cherney, 2012a;Reisig, Tankebe, & Meško, 2014;Hertogh, 2015). Other studies have shown that procedural justice and legitimacy influence support for vigilante violence, the use of violence for self-protection, and to achieve political goals (Jackson, Huq, Bradford, & Tyler, 2013;Tankebe, 2009b;Tyler & Jackson, 2014).…”

Section: Multidimensional Police Legitimacy Model 3 a Multidimensionamentioning

confidence: 97%

A multidimensional model of police legitimacy: A cross-cultural assessment.

Tankebe

Reisig

Wang

2016

Law and Human Behavior

198

142

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study used survey data from cross-sectional, university-based samples of young adults in different cultural settings (i.e., the United States and Ghana) to accomplish 2 main objectives: (1) to construct a 4-dimensional police legitimacy scale, and (2) to assess the relationship that police legitimacy and feelings of obligation to obey the police have with 2 outcome measures. The fit statistics for the second-order confirmatory factor models indicated that the 4-dimensional police legitimacy model is reasonably consistent with the data in both samples. Results from the linear regression analyses showed that the police legitimacy scale is related to cooperation with the police, and that the observed association is attenuated when the obligation to obey scale is included in the model specification in both the United States and Ghana data. A similar pattern emerged in the U.S. sample when estimating compliance with the law models. However, although police legitimacy was associated with compliance in the Ghana sample, this relationship along with the test statistic for the sense of obligation to obey estimate were both null in the fully saturated equation. The findings provide support for the Bottoms and Tankebe's (2012) argument that legitimacy is multidimensional, comprising police lawfulness, distributive fairness, procedural fairness, and effectiveness. However, the link between police legitimacy and social order appears to be culturally variable.

show abstract

Section: Multidimensional Police Legitimacy Model 3 a Multidimensionamentioning

confidence: 97%

A multidimensional model of police legitimacy: A cross-cultural assessment.

Tankebe

Reisig

Wang

2016

Law and Human Behavior

198

142

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

An Investigator in Post-Soviet Criminal Process

Савельев¹

2018

Juridical Journal of Samara University

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article is devoted to the development of legislation on pre-trial proceedings in criminal cases in the post-Soviet countries. Changes in the rights of the defence during the preliminary investigation of these countries are considered. The lack of a link between the actions of the investigating judge and the competitiveness of preliminary investigation is shown. The comparative analysis of historical and contemporary forms of participation by investigating judges in the criminal process is carried out. The general trends of development of legislation of the former Soviet States are set. Recommendations for improving legislation are given.

show abstract

Сравнительно-Правовой Анализ Нормативных Актов, Регламентирующих Производство Судебной Экспертизы И Процессуальный Статус Сведущих Лиц В Уголовном Процессе России И Германии

Лукичев¹,

Alekseev²

2020

NOMOTHETIKA: Философия. Социология. Право

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Современный тип немецкого уголовного процесса является наиболее ярким представителем романо-германской правовой системы и поэтому служит объектом сравнения с уголовным судопроизводством других стран. Вместе с тем вопросы применения сведущими лицами специальных знаний в уголовном процессе России и Германии изучены недостаточно. В связи с этим авторы провели сравнительно-правовой анализ норм уголовно-процессуального законодательства России и Германии, регламентирующих производство судебной экспертизы. В результате выявлены общие и отличительные свойства, степень сходства и различия юридических терминов, используемых в отношении указанных лиц в нормативно-правовых актах сопоставляемых правовых систем. Ключевой фигурой в уголовном процессе Германии является суд, который несет бремя доказывания, совмещая функции обвинения и разрешения дела по существу. Сведущие лица в качестве самостоятельных участников уголовного судопроизводства не рассматриваются, поскольку являются «средствами судебного доказывания». Результаты исследования позволяют по-новому взглянуть на отечественный институт сведущих лиц, а также расширить представление о применении специальных знаний в уголовном процессе Федеративной Республики Германия и государств, следующих в «кильватере» немецкого Strafprozess.

show abstract

Comparative overview of the preliminary proceedings in the Republic of Serbia, Germany, and Italy

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

A multidimensional model of police legitimacy: A cross-cultural assessment.

A multidimensional model of police legitimacy: A cross-cultural assessment.

An Investigator in Post-Soviet Criminal Process

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About