2006 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics 2006
DOI: 10.1109/aqtr.2006.254513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Performance Analysis of Artificial Reverberation Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When h i (z) and t(z) are not present, it is possible to choose the coefficients so that all poles are precisely located on the unity circle of the z-plane [1,7,9,10]. Consequently, the system becomes lossless and lays in the edge of stability, resulting in an output with infinite reverberation time.…”
Section: The Reference Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When h i (z) and t(z) are not present, it is possible to choose the coefficients so that all poles are precisely located on the unity circle of the z-plane [1,7,9,10]. Consequently, the system becomes lossless and lays in the edge of stability, resulting in an output with infinite reverberation time.…”
Section: The Reference Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general FDN model [7] is shown in Fig. 2 In the absence of the absorbent and output filters, equations 1 and 2 completely define the FDN [1,9,10], where ) i ≤ N , are the delay line outputs at sample time n:…”
Section: The Reference Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations