2012
DOI: 10.1002/jps.23292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Pharmacokinetics Studies of Immediate- and Modified-Release Formulations of Glipizide in Pigs and Dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For formulations with glipizide, the pig was reported to be a suitable model to predict modified release formulation performance. Kulkarni et al . reported that the porcine absorption kinetics were consistent with the published clinical data, conversely the beagle dog was less consistent compared to humans.…”
Section: The Use Of the Pig Model For Assessing In Vivo Performance Omentioning
confidence: 73%
“…For formulations with glipizide, the pig was reported to be a suitable model to predict modified release formulation performance. Kulkarni et al . reported that the porcine absorption kinetics were consistent with the published clinical data, conversely the beagle dog was less consistent compared to humans.…”
Section: The Use Of the Pig Model For Assessing In Vivo Performance Omentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Domesticated swine weighing up to 50 kg have been used in research studies in our laboratories, and miniature pigs have also been utilized in preclinical testing because they are easy to handle (41). In a comparative PK study of glipizide, pig and dog models were used for immediate and modified release formulations (42). For the 10 mg modified release formulation, pigs showed a more consistent exposure with a coefficient of variance of 54% which was lower compared to dogs (80%).…”
Section: Inadequacy Of Preclinical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drug absorption from modified (i.e., controlled or sustained) release dosage forms has been examined in numerous studies. Kulkarni et al (2012) compared the absorption of immediate and modified release in immature farm pigs (;3.5-4 months; 21-27 kg) and dogs (apparently under fasting conditions). The results suggested that the pig may be more suitable an animal model on the basis of smaller variance in area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and a higher BA (;80%, similar to humans).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%