2012
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.12026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative phylogeography of the ants Myrmica ruginodis and Myrmica rubra

Abstract: Aim Here we compare the phylogeographies of the ants Myrmica ruginodis and Myrmica rubra. We test the hypotheses that owing to differences in their cold tolerance and life-history traits, M. ruginodis has less differentiated populations, a weaker phylogeographical structure and some Pleistocene refugia further north than M. rubra.Location The Palaearctic region, from western Europe to Siberia and from Fennoscandia to the northern parts of the Mediterranean peninsulas and Turkey.Methods We sequenced mitochondri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(151 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An explanation for the patterns of variation in chill coma recovery time along the transect might partly lie in the history of distribution of the species over their ranges. From recent studies of the Myrmica phylogeography, partly based on samples from the same three localities (Leppänen et al, 2013), it follows that the southern population of M. rubra formed through almost a completely separate route of colonization, because it is more closely related to populations in areas southwest of it (the region of the Balkans and southern Carpathians). Therefore, its faster recovery after chill coma might reflect a higher selection for the trait in those montane areas.…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An explanation for the patterns of variation in chill coma recovery time along the transect might partly lie in the history of distribution of the species over their ranges. From recent studies of the Myrmica phylogeography, partly based on samples from the same three localities (Leppänen et al, 2013), it follows that the southern population of M. rubra formed through almost a completely separate route of colonization, because it is more closely related to populations in areas southwest of it (the region of the Balkans and southern Carpathians). Therefore, its faster recovery after chill coma might reflect a higher selection for the trait in those montane areas.…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myrmica rubra and M. ruginodis are common Palaearctic ant species that diverged about 9 million years ago, without further speciation (Jansen et al, 2010); they are relatively abundant over a wide range of latitudes and very often share the same habitats (Leppänen et al, 2013). Myrmica colonies are non-territorial (Savolainen et al, 1989), polygynous, and display a prolonged type of annual cycle (Kipyatkov, 2001), whereby worker ants either grow from eggs to adults within one warm season or delay their development until the next year by entering a diapause at the last (third) larval instar.…”
Section: Species and Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dependent foundation results in a pattern of isolation‐by‐distance within populations and increases genetic differentiation between populations (Liautard & Keller, ; Clemencet et al ., ; Leppänen et al. , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several ant lineages diverged during the Pleistocene, eventually giving rise to new species (Goropashnaya et al ., , ; Schlick‐Steiner et al ., ; Wysocka et al ., ; Leppänen et al ., ). Liometopum microcephalum arose already during the Pliocene, but the origin of its individual European clades is apparently related to the Pleistocene climatic oscillations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taberlet et al ., ; Fijarczyk et al ., ; Kuznetsova et al ., ), fewer studies dealt with invertebrates (e.g. Rokas et al ., ; Goropashnaya et al ., ; Schmitt et al ., ; Schlick‐Steiner et al ., ; Leppänen et al ., , ). In ants, most studies have been done on a small spatial scale (Pusch et al ., ; Mäki‐Petäys & Breene, ; Wysocka et al ., ) or compared a few distinct populations only (Goropashnaya et al ., ; Sanllorente et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%